TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative use of recombinant human erythropoietin in patients refusing blood transfusions. Pathophysiological considerations based on 5 cases
AU - Wolff, M.
AU - Fandrey, J.
AU - Hirner, A.
AU - Jelkmann, W.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - The efficacy of the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in the treatment of anaemia in critically ill surgical patients refusing red cell transfusions requires further documentation. Herein, we report the outcome of 5 consecutive severely anaemic Jehovah's Witness patients (lowest haemoglobin concentration 27 g/l, who were discharged from the hospital in good condition after treatment. RHuEPO (50-280 U/kg body weight) was daily administered to 4 of the patients, who either exhibited preoperative anaemia or developed postoperative anaemia refractory to endogenous EPO probably due to inflammation. RHuEPO treatment was followed by a steep rise in reticulocytes and haemoglobin concentration. The fifth patient, who exhibited no signs of systemic inflammation following emergency hemicolectomy, was also treated with intravenous iron, but not with rHuEPO. His blood haemoglobin concentration rose from 27 g/l to 92 g/l in 3 wk. These observations indicate that the administration of rHuEPO is justified in the management of life-threatening anaemia, although only on a humanitarian basis, because there is no predictor for the possible spontaneous recovery.
AB - The efficacy of the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in the treatment of anaemia in critically ill surgical patients refusing red cell transfusions requires further documentation. Herein, we report the outcome of 5 consecutive severely anaemic Jehovah's Witness patients (lowest haemoglobin concentration 27 g/l, who were discharged from the hospital in good condition after treatment. RHuEPO (50-280 U/kg body weight) was daily administered to 4 of the patients, who either exhibited preoperative anaemia or developed postoperative anaemia refractory to endogenous EPO probably due to inflammation. RHuEPO treatment was followed by a steep rise in reticulocytes and haemoglobin concentration. The fifth patient, who exhibited no signs of systemic inflammation following emergency hemicolectomy, was also treated with intravenous iron, but not with rHuEPO. His blood haemoglobin concentration rose from 27 g/l to 92 g/l in 3 wk. These observations indicate that the administration of rHuEPO is justified in the management of life-threatening anaemia, although only on a humanitarian basis, because there is no predictor for the possible spontaneous recovery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030966177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1997.tb00941.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1997.tb00941.x
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 9150708
AN - SCOPUS:0030966177
SN - 0902-4441
VL - 58
SP - 154
EP - 159
JO - European Journal of Haematology
JF - European Journal of Haematology
IS - 3
ER -