Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perioperative Chemotherapy or Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

Jens Hoeppner*, Thomas Brunner, Claudia Schmoor, Peter Bronsert, Birte Kulemann, Rainer Claus, Stefan Utzolino, Jakob Robert Izbicki, Ines Gockel, Berthold Gerdes, Michael Ghadimi, Benedikt Reichert, Johan F. Lock, Christiane Bruns, Ernst Reitsamer, Maximillian Schmeding, Frank Benedix, Tobias Keck, Gunnar Folprecht, Peter Thuss-PatienceUlf Peter Neumann, Andreas Pascher, Detlef Imhof, Severin Daum, Tanja Strieder, Christian Krautz, Simone Zimmermann, Jens Werner, Rolf Mahlberg, Gerald Illerhaus, Peter Grimminger, Florian Lordick

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background The best multimodal approach for resectable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is unclear. An important question is whether perioperative chemotherapy is preferable to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Methods In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma to receive perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) plus surgery or preoperative chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy at a dose of 41.4 Gy and carboplatin and paclitaxel) plus surgery. Eligibility criteria included a primary tumor with a clinical stage of cT1 cN+, cT2-4a cN+, or cT2-4a cN0 disease, in which T indicates the size and extent of the tumor (higher numbers indicate a more advanced tumor), and N indicates the presence (N+) or absence (N0) of cancer spread to the lymph nodes, without evidence of metastatic spread. The primary end point was overall survival. Results From February 2016 through April 2020, we assigned 221 patients to the FLOT group and 217 patients to the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group. With a median follow-up of 55 months, overall survival at 3 years was 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1 to 64.0) in the FLOT group and 50.7% (95% CI, 43.5 to 57.5) in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Progression-free survival at 3 years was 51.6% (95% CI, 44.3 to 58.4) in the FLOT group and 35.0% (95% CI, 28.4 to 41.7) in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85). Among the patients who started the assigned treatment, grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 120 of 207 patients (58.0%) in the FLOT group and in 98 of 196 patients (50.0%) in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group. Serious adverse events were observed in 98 of 207 patients (47.3%) in the FLOT group and in 82 of 196 patients (41.8%) in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group. Mortality at 90 days after surgery was 3.1% in the FLOT group and 5.6% in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group. Conclusions Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT led to improved survival among patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma as compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume392
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)323-335
Number of pages13
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23.01.2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.22-14 Hematology, Oncology
  • 2.22-09 Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perioperative Chemotherapy or Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this