Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pentobarbital, in subanesthetic doses, depresses spinal transmission of nociceptive information but does not affect stimulation-produced descending inhibition in the cat

J. Sandkühler, Q. G. Fu, C. Helmchen, M. Zimmermann*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

The present study evaluates the effect of systemic pentobarbital on the spinal transmission of nociceptive information and on stimulation-produced descending inhibition in the deeply anesthetized, paralyzed cat. Single neuronal responses to noxious skin heating were recorded extracellulary in the lumbar dorsal horn and found to be depressed by pentobarbital at subanesthetic doses (4.0, 8.0, 17.0 and 24.5 mg/kg) in a dose-dependent manner. At 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg, depression by pentobarbital was positively correlated with the depth of the recording site in the spinal cord (laminae IV-VI) i.e., neurons in deeper laminae (V-VI) were attenuated, while neurons in lamina IV were unaffected. At all doses tested, pentobarbital failed to affect stimulation-produced descending inhibition from either the midbrain periaqueductal gray or the medullary nucleus raphe magnus. The present data furnish evidence for the antinociceptive potency of pentobarbital, they do not support the view that a 'partial pharmacological spinal cord transection' would attenuate stimulation-produced descending inhibition of nociceptive dorsal horn neurons.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPain
Volume31
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)381-390
Number of pages10
ISSN0304-3959
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.1987

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pentobarbital, in subanesthetic doses, depresses spinal transmission of nociceptive information but does not affect stimulation-produced descending inhibition in the cat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this