Oxygenation and lung morphology in a rabbit pediatric ARDS- model under high peak pressure ventilation plus nitric oxide and surfactant compared with veno-venous ECMO

Jens Christian Möller*, I. Reiss, T. F. Schaible, M. Kohl, W. Göpel, T. Fischer, E. M. Nitsche, S. Krüger

*Corresponding author for this work
3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate which of two treatment options of saline lavage induced ARDS in rabbits is better in terms of oxygenation and prevention of barotrauma: combined high peak pressure ventilation with surfactant administration and inhaled nitric oxide or veno-venous ECMO combined with low peak inspiratory pressure ventilation. Materials and methods: After saline lavage (10 cc/kg repeated as long as foamy retrieval was observed) two combined therapeutic strategies were examined: ventilation with high inspiratory pressures (35 cm H2O) with additional exogenous surfactant administration (100 mg/kg) and inhaled nitric oxide (10 PPM) (n=5, group 1) and low inspiratory pressure (20 cm H2O) ventilation under veno-venous ECMO support (n=5, group 2). The FiO2 was maintained at 1.0 in both groups. The paO2/FiO2 ratio was calculated in 30 minute intervals for 4 hours. After that the animals were sacrificed and the lungs examined macro- and microscopically. Aeration was described in a semiquantitative method using the alveolar expansion index. Oxygenation in group 1 was significantly better than in group 2, it increased significantly after surfactant but not after additional nitric oxide administration. However, the lungs in group 1 showed severe signs of baro/ergotrauma (Hyaline membranes, air leaks, infiltration of polymorphonuclear (PMN) granulocytes and macrophages, break down of alveolar capillary membranes) after 4 hrs of combined therapy, whereas the lungs in group 2 appeared normal. Adding surfactant and NO to a high tidal volume ventilation improved oxygenation, but did not prevent baro/ergotrauma. Ventilation with low inspiratory pressures combined with ECMO caused little baro/ergotrauma but adequate oxygenation could not be achieved, probably due to anatomical features of the rabbit which do not allow appropriate blood flow within the ECMO-circuit.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Artificial Organs
Volume22
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)747-753
Number of pages7
ISSN0391-3988
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11.1999

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oxygenation and lung morphology in a rabbit pediatric ARDS- model under high peak pressure ventilation plus nitric oxide and surfactant compared with veno-venous ECMO'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this