TY - JOUR
T1 - Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements
AU - Biermann-Ruben, Katja
AU - Jonas, Melanie
AU - Kessler, Klaus
AU - Siebner, Hartwig Roman
AU - Bäumer, Tobias
AU - Schnitzler, Alfons
AU - Münchau, Alexander
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Volkswagenstiftung (Project Grant I /78553).
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Our motor and perceptual representations of actions seem to be intimately linked and the human mirror neuron system (MNS) has been proposed as the mediator. In two experiments, we presented biological or non-biological movement stimuli that were either congruent or incongruent to a required response prompted by a tone. When the tone occurred with the onset of the last movement in a series, i.e., it was perceived during the movement presentation, congruent biological stimuli resulted in faster reaction times than congruent non-biological stimuli. The opposite was observed for incongruent stimuli. When the tone was presented after visual movement stimulation, however, no such interaction was present. This implies that biological movement stimuli only affect motor behaviour during visual processing but not thereafter. These data suggest that the MNS is an "online" system; longstanding repetitive visual stimulation (Experiment 1) has no benefit in comparison to only one or two repetitions (Experiment 2).
AB - Our motor and perceptual representations of actions seem to be intimately linked and the human mirror neuron system (MNS) has been proposed as the mediator. In two experiments, we presented biological or non-biological movement stimuli that were either congruent or incongruent to a required response prompted by a tone. When the tone occurred with the onset of the last movement in a series, i.e., it was perceived during the movement presentation, congruent biological stimuli resulted in faster reaction times than congruent non-biological stimuli. The opposite was observed for incongruent stimuli. When the tone was presented after visual movement stimulation, however, no such interaction was present. This implies that biological movement stimuli only affect motor behaviour during visual processing but not thereafter. These data suggest that the MNS is an "online" system; longstanding repetitive visual stimulation (Experiment 1) has no benefit in comparison to only one or two repetitions (Experiment 2).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52949136282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.005
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 18433965
AN - SCOPUS:52949136282
SN - 0278-2626
VL - 68
SP - 107
EP - 113
JO - Brain and Cognition
JF - Brain and Cognition
IS - 1
ER -