Nulliparous patients with small stature delivering at term have an increased risk of secondary cesarean section

Michael K. Bohlmann, Doerte W. Luedders, Daniel Beyer, Andreas Kavallaris, Kristin Baumann, Klaus Diedrich, Amadeus Hornemann*

*Corresponding author for this work
6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the obstetric outcome of pregnant patients with small stature (<5th percentile) with regard to the mode of delivery, maternal injuries, and neonatal parameters. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 13 years of deliveries. Two groups: group A, patients with a height below the 5th percentile, and group B, patients with a body height between the 25th and 75th percentile. Results: Patients with a body height between the 25th and 75th percentiles showed significantly more spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Secondary cesarean sections (CS) were significantly seen more often in mothers with a small body height. The fetal outcome did not differ significantly between both groups (APGAR, arterial cord pH, base excess). Conclusions: Patients with body height below the 5th percentile were found to have a significantly higher rate of secondary CS. As less than half of our patients with a body height below the 5th percentile were found to have delivered spontaneously at term, pregnancies in small patients should be recognized by obstetricians to be at a specific risk. Whereas the neonatal outcome appears to be comparable between nulliparous women with a body height below the 5th percentile and those with a body height between the 25th and 75th percentiles, small mothers carry a significantly elevated risk of surgical delivery, which should be addressed in prospective studies and in counseling these patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume282
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)241-244
Number of pages4
ISSN0932-0067
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nulliparous patients with small stature delivering at term have an increased risk of secondary cesarean section'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this