Abstract

The value of normative models in research and clinical practice relies on their robustness and a systematic comparison of different modelling algorithms and parameters; however, this has not been done to date. We aimed to identify the optimal approach for normative modelling of brain morphometric data through systematic empirical benchmarking, by quantifying the accuracy of different algorithms and identifying parameters that optimised model performance. We developed this framework with regional morphometric data from 37 407 healthy individuals (53% female and 47% male; aged 3–90 years) from 87 datasets from Europe, Australia, the USA, South Africa, and east Asia following a comparative evaluation of eight algorithms and multiple covariate combinations pertaining to image acquisition and quality, parcellation software versions, global neuroimaging measures, and longitudinal stability. The multivariate fractional polynomial regression (MFPR) emerged as the preferred algorithm, optimised with non-linear polynomials for age and linear effects of global measures as covariates. The MFPR models showed excellent accuracy across the lifespan and within distinct age-bins and longitudinal stability over a 2-year period. The performance of all MFPR models plateaued at sample sizes exceeding 3000 study participants. This model can inform about the biological and behavioural implications of deviations from typical age-related neuroanatomical changes and support future study designs. The model and scripts described here are freely available through CentileBrain.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Lancet Digital Health
Volume6
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)e211-e221
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2024

Funding

FundersFunder number
Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure84.021.00, 184–033–111
Child Health and Human Development, Drug Abuse
Geestkracht Programme of the Dutch Health Research Council10–000–1001
Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development400–07–080, 481–08–011, 451–04–034, 463–06–001, 912–10–020, 31160008, 400–05–717, 904–61–193, 480–15–001/674, 911–09–032, 016–115–035, 056–32–010, 480–04–004, 024–001–003, 904–61–090, 985–10–002
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)UL1 TR000153, R01CA101318, R01MH090553, R01MH116147, P30AG10133, U54EB020403, R01MH117014, R01AG19771, T32MH122394, U24RR025736, R01MH104284, U24RR021992, RC2DA029475, U24RR025761, R01HD050735, R01MH113619, R01MH042191
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Mount Sinai School of MedicineUL1TR004419
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme667302, 643051
European Research CouncilERC–230374, ED1615
National Health and Medical Research Council496682, 1009064
Russian Foundation for Basic Research20–013–00748
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung01ZZ0403, 016–130–669, 91619115, 01ZZ0103, 01ZZ9603
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek51–02–061, MagW 480–04–004, 51–02–062, NWO 433–09–220, 433–09–229, NW0-SP 56–464–14192
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
VetenskapsrådetK2008–62P–20597–01–3, 521–2014–3487, K2012–61X–15078–09–3, 2017–00949, 523–2014–3467, K2010–62X–15078–07–2, K2007–62X–15077–04–1
Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIPI060507, PI050427, PI14/00639, PI020499, PI14/00918
Seventh Framework Programme602805, 602450, 278948, 603016
University of British Columbia
Norges Forskningsråd223273
Helse Sør-Øst RHF2013–054, 2017–112
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Medical Research Council CanadaG0500092
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de ValdecillaNCT0235832, API07/011, NCT02534363

    Research Areas and Centers

    • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

    DFG Research Classification Scheme

    • 2.23-10 Clinical Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Normative modelling of brain morphometry across the lifespan with CentileBrain: algorithm benchmarking and model optimisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this