Abstract
Patients with non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma are treated in a risk-adopted fashion. Genetically stable low-grade tumors are treated with transurethral resection followed by optional intravesical treatment to prevent tumor recurrence. In cases of high-grade tumors, transurethral resection is followed by a second resection after 4-6 weeks. For patients with carcinoma in situ or high-grade T1 carcinomas, guidelines recommend BCG treatment to prevent recurrence and progression. These recommendations are based on meta-analyses resulting in a 4% reduction of tumor progression. Results published in 2009 and 2010 critically analyze BCG treatment of high-grade bladder tumors and are the focus of this article.
| Translated title of the contribution | Non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Is BCG still a necessary part of treatment? |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Journal | Urologe - Ausgabe A |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1274-1276 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISSN | 0340-2592 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.10.2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Is BCG still a necessary part of treatment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver