Nichtmuskelinvasives Urothelkarzinom: Ist die Anwendung von BCG noch notwendig?

Translated title of the contribution: Non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Is BCG still a necessary part of treatment?

F. Vom Dorp*, S. Tschirdewahn, H. Rübben, D. Jocham

*Corresponding author for this work
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma are treated in a risk-adopted fashion. Genetically stable low-grade tumors are treated with transurethral resection followed by optional intravesical treatment to prevent tumor recurrence. In cases of high-grade tumors, transurethral resection is followed by a second resection after 4-6 weeks. For patients with carcinoma in situ or high-grade T1 carcinomas, guidelines recommend BCG treatment to prevent recurrence and progression. These recommendations are based on meta-analyses resulting in a 4% reduction of tumor progression. Results published in 2009 and 2010 critically analyze BCG treatment of high-grade bladder tumors and are the focus of this article.

Translated title of the contributionNon-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Is BCG still a necessary part of treatment?
Original languageGerman
JournalUrologe - Ausgabe A
Volume49
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1274-1276
Number of pages3
ISSN0340-2592
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.10.2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Is BCG still a necessary part of treatment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this