TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurobiologically Based Stratification of Recent-Onset Depression and Psychosis
T2 - Identification of Two Distinct Transdiagnostic Phenotypes
AU - PRONIA-consortium
AU - Lalousis, Paris Alexandros
AU - Schmaal, Lianne
AU - Wood, Stephen J.
AU - Reniers, Renate L.E.P.
AU - Barnes, Nicholas M.
AU - Chisholm, Katharine
AU - Griffiths, Sian Lowri
AU - Stainton, Alexandra
AU - Wen, Junhao
AU - Hwang, Gyujoon
AU - Davatzikos, Christos
AU - Wenzel, Julian
AU - Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
AU - Andreou, Christina
AU - Bonivento, Carolina
AU - Dannlowski, Udo
AU - Ferro, Adele
AU - Lichtenstein, Theresa
AU - Riecher-Rössler, Anita
AU - Romer, Georg
AU - Rosen, Marlene
AU - Bertolino, Alessandro
AU - Borgwardt, Stefan
AU - Brambilla, Paolo
AU - Kambeitz, Joseph
AU - Lencer, Rebekka
AU - Pantelis, Christos
AU - Ruhrmann, Stephan
AU - Salokangas, Raimo K.R.
AU - Schultze-Lutter, Frauke
AU - Schmidt, André
AU - Meisenzahl, Eva
AU - Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
AU - Dwyer, Dominic
AU - Upthegrove, Rachel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Society of Biological Psychiatry
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Background: Identifying neurobiologically based transdiagnostic categories of depression and psychosis may elucidate heterogeneity and provide better candidates for predictive modeling. We aimed to identify clusters across patients with recent-onset depression (ROD) and recent-onset psychosis (ROP) based on structural neuroimaging data. We hypothesized that these transdiagnostic clusters would identify patients with poor outcome and allow more accurate prediction of symptomatic remission than traditional diagnostic structures. Methods: HYDRA (Heterogeneity through Discriminant Analysis) was trained on whole-brain volumetric measures from 577 participants from the discovery sample of the multisite PRONIA study to identify neurobiologically driven clusters, which were then externally validated in the PRONIA replication sample (n = 404) and three datasets of chronic samples (Centre for Biomedical Research Excellence, n = 146; Mind Clinical Imaging Consortium, n = 202; Munich, n = 470). Results: The optimal clustering solution was two transdiagnostic clusters (cluster 1: n = 153, 67 ROP, 86 ROD; cluster 2: n = 149, 88 ROP, 61 ROD; adjusted Rand index = 0.618). The two clusters contained both patients with ROP and patients with ROD. One cluster had widespread gray matter volume deficits and more positive, negative, and functional deficits (impaired cluster), and one cluster revealed a more preserved neuroanatomical signature and more core depressive symptomatology (preserved cluster). The clustering solution was internally and externally validated and assessed for clinical utility in predicting 9-month symptomatic remission, outperforming traditional diagnostic structures. Conclusions: We identified two transdiagnostic neuroanatomically informed clusters that are clinically and biologically distinct, challenging current diagnostic boundaries in recent-onset mental health disorders. These results may aid understanding of the etiology of poor outcome patients transdiagnostically and improve development of stratified treatments.
AB - Background: Identifying neurobiologically based transdiagnostic categories of depression and psychosis may elucidate heterogeneity and provide better candidates for predictive modeling. We aimed to identify clusters across patients with recent-onset depression (ROD) and recent-onset psychosis (ROP) based on structural neuroimaging data. We hypothesized that these transdiagnostic clusters would identify patients with poor outcome and allow more accurate prediction of symptomatic remission than traditional diagnostic structures. Methods: HYDRA (Heterogeneity through Discriminant Analysis) was trained on whole-brain volumetric measures from 577 participants from the discovery sample of the multisite PRONIA study to identify neurobiologically driven clusters, which were then externally validated in the PRONIA replication sample (n = 404) and three datasets of chronic samples (Centre for Biomedical Research Excellence, n = 146; Mind Clinical Imaging Consortium, n = 202; Munich, n = 470). Results: The optimal clustering solution was two transdiagnostic clusters (cluster 1: n = 153, 67 ROP, 86 ROD; cluster 2: n = 149, 88 ROP, 61 ROD; adjusted Rand index = 0.618). The two clusters contained both patients with ROP and patients with ROD. One cluster had widespread gray matter volume deficits and more positive, negative, and functional deficits (impaired cluster), and one cluster revealed a more preserved neuroanatomical signature and more core depressive symptomatology (preserved cluster). The clustering solution was internally and externally validated and assessed for clinical utility in predicting 9-month symptomatic remission, outperforming traditional diagnostic structures. Conclusions: We identified two transdiagnostic neuroanatomically informed clusters that are clinically and biologically distinct, challenging current diagnostic boundaries in recent-onset mental health disorders. These results may aid understanding of the etiology of poor outcome patients transdiagnostically and improve development of stratified treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132873503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.03.021
DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.03.021
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 35717212
AN - SCOPUS:85132873503
SN - 0006-3223
VL - 92
SP - 552
EP - 562
JO - Biological Psychiatry
JF - Biological Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -