TY - JOUR
T1 - Myocardial late enhancement in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI
T2 - Distinction between infarction scar and non-infarction-related disease
AU - Hunold, Peter
AU - Schlosser, Thomas
AU - Vogt, Florian M.
AU - Eggebrecht, Holger
AU - Schmermund, Axel
AU - Bruder, Oliver
AU - Schüler, Walter O.
AU - Barkhausen, Jörg
PY - 2005/1/1
Y1 - 2005/1/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to assess and compare the patterns of late enhancement (LE) in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI caused by myocardial infarction and different myocardial diseases that are not related to ischemic infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 811 consecutive contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI studies performed for different indications were reviewed for left ventricular myocardial LE after gadopentetate dimeglumine administration. MRI studies were performed on a 1.5-T scanner using an inversion recovery turbo FLASH sequence (TR/TE, 8/4 msec; flip angle, 25°). The LE pattern of ischemic infarction scar was compared with that in nonischemic myocardial disease. RESULTS. LE was found in 421 (52%) patients. In all patients with myocardial infarction, LE included the subendocardial layer. Nineteen patients without history of myocardial infarction and angiographically excluded coronary artery disease showed different patterns of LE caused by myocarditis, sarcoidosis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, cardiomyopathy, endomyocardial fibrosis, and iatrogenic scars after biopsy, ablation of septal hypertrophy, and myocardial laser revascularization. CONCLUSION. LE in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI is not specific for ischemic infarction. LE in ischemic infarction always involves the subendocardial layer, whereas it does not necessarily do so in other myocardial diseases. Therefore, if LE omits the subendocardial layer, different nonischemic myocardial diseases have to be considered. The pattern of LE might be helpful for the differential diagnosis of myocardial disease and in distinguishing it from ischemic disease.
AB - OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to assess and compare the patterns of late enhancement (LE) in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI caused by myocardial infarction and different myocardial diseases that are not related to ischemic infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 811 consecutive contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI studies performed for different indications were reviewed for left ventricular myocardial LE after gadopentetate dimeglumine administration. MRI studies were performed on a 1.5-T scanner using an inversion recovery turbo FLASH sequence (TR/TE, 8/4 msec; flip angle, 25°). The LE pattern of ischemic infarction scar was compared with that in nonischemic myocardial disease. RESULTS. LE was found in 421 (52%) patients. In all patients with myocardial infarction, LE included the subendocardial layer. Nineteen patients without history of myocardial infarction and angiographically excluded coronary artery disease showed different patterns of LE caused by myocarditis, sarcoidosis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, cardiomyopathy, endomyocardial fibrosis, and iatrogenic scars after biopsy, ablation of septal hypertrophy, and myocardial laser revascularization. CONCLUSION. LE in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI is not specific for ischemic infarction. LE in ischemic infarction always involves the subendocardial layer, whereas it does not necessarily do so in other myocardial diseases. Therefore, if LE omits the subendocardial layer, different nonischemic myocardial diseases have to be considered. The pattern of LE might be helpful for the differential diagnosis of myocardial disease and in distinguishing it from ischemic disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19844372868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841420
DO - 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841420
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 15855089
AN - SCOPUS:19844372868
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 184
SP - 1420
EP - 1426
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 5
ER -