TY - JOUR
T1 - MRI of the liver: Can true FISP replace HASTE?
AU - Herborn, Christoph U.
AU - Vogt, Florian
AU - Lauenstein, Thomas C.
AU - Goyen, Mathias
AU - Debatin, Jörg F.
AU - Ruehm, Stephan G.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2003/2/1
Y1 - 2003/2/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of two fast breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences, half-Fourier acquired single turbo spin-echo (HASTE) and true fast imaging with steady state precession (TrueFISP), for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 186 patients with suspected focal liver lesions were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent the same standardized study protocol including HASTE and TrueFISP. A consensus reading based on all available image data served as a standard of reference for classifying lesions into cysts, hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, or malignant/other lesions. All malignant lesions, as well as hepatic adenomas and abscesses, were histologically verified. Each separated by an eight-week interval, HASTE and TrueFISP images were retrespectively reviewed in random order for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated. Results: HASTE images had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.91, whereas TrueFISP showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively (p>0.1). Conclusion: Neither HASTE nor TrueFISP alone are sufficient for the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions.
AB - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of two fast breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences, half-Fourier acquired single turbo spin-echo (HASTE) and true fast imaging with steady state precession (TrueFISP), for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 186 patients with suspected focal liver lesions were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent the same standardized study protocol including HASTE and TrueFISP. A consensus reading based on all available image data served as a standard of reference for classifying lesions into cysts, hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, or malignant/other lesions. All malignant lesions, as well as hepatic adenomas and abscesses, were histologically verified. Each separated by an eight-week interval, HASTE and TrueFISP images were retrespectively reviewed in random order for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated. Results: HASTE images had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.91, whereas TrueFISP showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively (p>0.1). Conclusion: Neither HASTE nor TrueFISP alone are sufficient for the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037307572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.10248
DO - 10.1002/jmri.10248
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 12541226
AN - SCOPUS:0037307572
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 17
SP - 190
EP - 196
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 2
ER -