Low Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition as Stroke Segmentation Prior: Useful or Not? A Random Forest-Based Evaluation Study

René Werner, Daniel Schetelig, Thilo Sothmann, Eike Mücke, Matthias Wilms, Bastian Cheng, Nils Daniel Forkert

Abstract

Manual ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in MR image data is a time-consuming task subject to inter-rater variability. Reliable automated lesion segmentation is of high interest for clinical trials and research in ischemic stroke. However, recent segmentation challenges (e.g. ISLES 2015) illustrate that current state-of-the-art approaches still lack accuracy and ischemic stroke segmentation remains a complicated problem. Within this context, low rank-&-sparse matrix decomposition (also known as robust PCA, RPCA) and RPCA-based non-linear subject-toatlas registration could provide valuable segmentation prior information. The aim of this study is to evaluate the suitability of RPCA and RPCAbased registration for ischemic stroke segmentation in follow-up FLAIR MR data sets. Building on a top-ranked segmentation approach of ISLES 2015, the performance of RPCA sparse component image information as random forest (RF) feature is evaluated. A comprehensive feature-byfeature comparison of the segmentation performance with and without RPCA sparse component information as RF feature illustrate the potential of low rank-&-sparse decomposition to improve stroke segmentation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2017
EditorsK.H. Maier-Hein, T.M. Deserno, H. Handels, T. Tolxdorff
Number of pages6
PublisherSpringer Vieweg, Berlin Heidelberg
Publication date01.03.2017
Pages161-166
ISBN (Print)978-3-662-54344-3
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-662-54345-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.03.2017
EventBildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2017
- Heidelberg, Germany
Duration: 12.03.201714.03.2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition as Stroke Segmentation Prior: Useful or Not? A Random Forest-Based Evaluation Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this