Long-Term prognosis after extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock: Results from a real-world cohort

Suzanne De Waha*, Georg Fuernau, Steffen Desch, Ingo Eitell, Ariane Wiedau, Philipp Lurz, Gerhard Schuler, Holger Thiele

*Corresponding author for this work
15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The current study presents data from a real-world cohort of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) with the aims of reporting clinical experience, objectifying complications as well as survival, and identifying predictors of mortality. Methods and results: Eighty-Three patients with refractory CS underwent percutaneous ECLS implantation performed by interventional cardiologists. Follow-up was performed at hospital discharge as well as at 18 months (IQR 15-36). Good clinical outcome was defined as survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) of 1-2. Median age was 61 years (IQR 50-72) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to ECLS implantation was performed in 46 patients (55.4%). Aetiologies of CS were acute myocardial infarction (63.9%), acute deterioration of ischaemic cardiomyopathy (6.0%) or non-ischaemic acute heart failure (16.9%), valvular heart disease (9.6%), and interventional complications (3.6%). Although initial ECLS weaning was successful in 47 patients (56.6%), in-hospital mortality was 68.7%. Of all 83 patients initially undergoing ECLS implantation, only 15 patients (18.1%) were alive at follow-up, 13 (15.7%) with a CPC of 1-2. Age was identified as an independent predictor of mortality (p=0.04). Conclusions: Despite ECLS support, the long-Term prognosis of patients with CS refractory to standard treatment remains poor.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume11
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1363-1371
Number of pages9
ISSN1774-024X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.03.2016

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term prognosis after extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock: Results from a real-world cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this