TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches for endometrial cancer Treatment: A comprehensive review
AU - Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
AU - Haggag, Hisham
AU - Baum, Sascha
AU - Kerl, Stephanie
AU - Rody, Achim
AU - Solomayer, Erich
PY - 2012/7/1
Y1 - 2012/7/1
N2 - Objective Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in the developed world, particularly among postmenopausal women. Endoscopic surgery is gaining more popularity among surgeons as a safe and feasible option for treatment of endometrial carcinoma, providing the possibility of adequate lymph node excision. Methods A comprehensive review. Results The advantages of laparoscopy prevail over lap-arotomy and authors report lower peri-operative complication rates, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay, as well as a better quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic surgery, in contrast to conventional abdominal surgery. This was confirmed by a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled studies. This is also true for obese risky patients to whom laparotomies carry indolent side effects. In addition, with more training and experience this procedure would be even more feasible and safer. Conclusions Because of the increasing importance of economic efficiency in health care, the endoscopic approach will continue to play a more important role in the future treatment of EC providing a better treatment option for the coming patients. As a promising therapeutical option, it should be offered to all patients with an early-stage EC.
AB - Objective Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in the developed world, particularly among postmenopausal women. Endoscopic surgery is gaining more popularity among surgeons as a safe and feasible option for treatment of endometrial carcinoma, providing the possibility of adequate lymph node excision. Methods A comprehensive review. Results The advantages of laparoscopy prevail over lap-arotomy and authors report lower peri-operative complication rates, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay, as well as a better quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic surgery, in contrast to conventional abdominal surgery. This was confirmed by a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled studies. This is also true for obese risky patients to whom laparotomies carry indolent side effects. In addition, with more training and experience this procedure would be even more feasible and safer. Conclusions Because of the increasing importance of economic efficiency in health care, the endoscopic approach will continue to play a more important role in the future treatment of EC providing a better treatment option for the coming patients. As a promising therapeutical option, it should be offered to all patients with an early-stage EC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864469779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-012-2254-1
DO - 10.1007/s00404-012-2254-1
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 22366805
AN - SCOPUS:84864469779
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 286
SP - 167
EP - 172
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 1
ER -