Is stereotactic radiosurgery the best treatment option for patients with spinal metastases? Commentary

Dirk Rades; Steven E. Schild

doi:10.1038/ncponc0846

Is stereotactic radiosurgery the best treatment option for patients with spinal metastases? Commentary

Dirk Rades^*, Steven E. Schild

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Radiotherapy

Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ

5 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	Nature Clinical Practice Oncology
Volume	4
Issue number	7
Pages (from-to)	400-401
Number of pages	2
ISSN	1743-4254
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0846
Publication status	Published - 07.2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1038/ncponc0846

Cite this

@article{d3f6e529808d436c9cb8c21a0e387b04,

title = "Is stereotactic radiosurgery the best treatment option for patients with spinal metastases? Commentary",

author = "Dirk Rades and Schild, \{Steven E.\}",

year = "2007",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1038/ncponc0846",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "400--401",

journal = "Nature Clinical Practice Oncology",

issn = "1743-4254",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is stereotactic radiosurgery the best treatment option for patients with spinal metastases? Commentary

AU - Rades, Dirk

AU - Schild, Steven E.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34447276697

U2 - 10.1038/ncponc0846

DO - 10.1038/ncponc0846

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:34447276697

SN - 1743-4254

VL - 4

SP - 400

EP - 401

JO - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

JF - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

IS - 7

ER -

Is stereotactic radiosurgery the best treatment option for patients with spinal metastases? Commentary

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this