TY - JOUR
T1 - International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer
AU - on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group
AU - Petersen, Morten Aa
AU - Aaronson, Neil K.
AU - Conroy, Thierry
AU - Costantini, Anna
AU - Giesinger, Johannes M.
AU - Hammerlid, Eva
AU - Holzner, Bernhard
AU - Johnson, Colin D.
AU - Kieffer, Jacobien M.
AU - van Leeuwen, Marieke
AU - Nolte, Sandra
AU - Ramage, John K.
AU - Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
AU - Waldmann, Annika
AU - Young, Teresa
AU - Zotti, Paola
AU - Groenvold, Mogens
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by the EORTC Quality of Life Group (Grant No. 007/2012 EXT). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or writing of the article. The executive committee of the EORTC Quality of Life Group read the article and approved it as being ‘on behalf of EORTC Quality of Life Group’. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) has developed computerised adaptive tests (CATs) for the 14 functional and symptom domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire. This is expected to optimise measurement precision, relevance to patients and flexibility. Here, we present the first international validation of the EORTC CAT Core. Methods: A heterogeneous sample of 699 cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was recruited across seven European countries. The EORTC CAT Core and all QLQ-C30 items were administered to participants before and after initiating treatment. Correlations between CAT and QLQ-C30 scores and floor/ceiling effects were calculated. Using several grouping variables, relative validity (cross-sectional known groups difference), responsiveness (changes over time) and relative sample size requirements of the CAT compared to the QLQ-C30 were estimated. Results: Correlations of the CAT and QLQ-C30 ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 across domains. The mean relative reduction in floor and ceiling effects using the CAT was 42% (range 3–99%). Analyses of known groups validity and responsiveness indicated that, across domains, mean sample size requirements for the CAT were 72% and 70%, respectively, of those using the QLQ-C30. Conclusions: The EORTC CAT Core measures the same domains as the QLQ-C30 with reduced floor/ceiling effects. The CAT generally facilitated the use of smaller samples (about 30% smaller on average) without loss of power compared to the QLQ-C30. Based on this study, the EORTC QLG will release the EORTC CAT Core for general use.
AB - Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) has developed computerised adaptive tests (CATs) for the 14 functional and symptom domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire. This is expected to optimise measurement precision, relevance to patients and flexibility. Here, we present the first international validation of the EORTC CAT Core. Methods: A heterogeneous sample of 699 cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was recruited across seven European countries. The EORTC CAT Core and all QLQ-C30 items were administered to participants before and after initiating treatment. Correlations between CAT and QLQ-C30 scores and floor/ceiling effects were calculated. Using several grouping variables, relative validity (cross-sectional known groups difference), responsiveness (changes over time) and relative sample size requirements of the CAT compared to the QLQ-C30 were estimated. Results: Correlations of the CAT and QLQ-C30 ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 across domains. The mean relative reduction in floor and ceiling effects using the CAT was 42% (range 3–99%). Analyses of known groups validity and responsiveness indicated that, across domains, mean sample size requirements for the CAT were 72% and 70%, respectively, of those using the QLQ-C30. Conclusions: The EORTC CAT Core measures the same domains as the QLQ-C30 with reduced floor/ceiling effects. The CAT generally facilitated the use of smaller samples (about 30% smaller on average) without loss of power compared to the QLQ-C30. Based on this study, the EORTC QLG will release the EORTC CAT Core for general use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078293618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-020-02421-9
DO - 10.1007/s11136-020-02421-9
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 31955374
AN - SCOPUS:85078293618
VL - 29
SP - 1405
EP - 1417
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
SN - 0962-9343
IS - 5
ER -