TY - JOUR
T1 - Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound to Guide Decongestion in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 Investigators
AU - Jobs, Alexander
AU - Rausch, Tanja K.
AU - König, Inke R.
AU - Vonthein, Reinhard
AU - Devendra, Ashika
AU - Schäfer, Jane
AU - Nauck, Matthias
AU - Eitel, Ingo
AU - Stiermaier, Thomas
AU - Laugwitz, Karl Ludwig
AU - Ledwoch, Jakob
AU - Valentova, Miroslava
AU - von Haehling, Stephan
AU - Störk, Stefan
AU - Arnold, Natalie
AU - Karakas, Mahir
AU - Westermann, Dirk
AU - Lenz, Tobias
AU - Gori, Tommaso
AU - Edelmann, Frank
AU - Seppelt, Philipp
AU - Felix, Stephan B.
AU - Lutz, Matthias
AU - Hedwig, Felix
AU - Akin, Ibrahim
AU - Scherer, Clemens
AU - Desch, Steffen
AU - Thiele, Holger
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Background: Residual congestion at hospital discharge after an episode of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with poor prognosis. There is no consensus on how optimal decongestion should be assessed. Objectives: This study aims to determine whether decongestive therapy guided by ultrasound measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters leads to greater reductions in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels from baseline to hospital discharge as compared with decongestion treatment guided by clinical assessment alone. Methods: In a randomized controlled multicenter trial, patients admitted for ADHF (NYHA functional class ≥III) exhibiting signs of pulmonary congestion, peripheral edema, and NT-proBNP levels >300 ng/L were randomized to either decongestion therapy guided by daily IVC ultrasound plus clinical assessment or clinical assessment alone. The primary endpoint was the change in NT-proBNP levels from baseline to discharge. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized, of which 327 were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The between-group difference in primary endpoint of change in NT-proBNP levels was 5.4% (95% CI: −9.4% to 22.6%; P = 0.58). Safety events were numerically less frequent in the IVC ultrasound–guided group. No difference between groups was consistently observed in secondary endpoints with similar rates of hemoconcentration and intensity of diuretic treatment. Conclusions: Additional ultrasound evaluation of IVC diameters did not improve decongestion treatment compared with clinical assessment alone among patients admitted for ADHF. (Ultrasound Evaluation of the IVC in Addition to Clinical Assessment to Guide Decongestion in ADHF [CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10]; NCT03140566).
AB - Background: Residual congestion at hospital discharge after an episode of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with poor prognosis. There is no consensus on how optimal decongestion should be assessed. Objectives: This study aims to determine whether decongestive therapy guided by ultrasound measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters leads to greater reductions in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels from baseline to hospital discharge as compared with decongestion treatment guided by clinical assessment alone. Methods: In a randomized controlled multicenter trial, patients admitted for ADHF (NYHA functional class ≥III) exhibiting signs of pulmonary congestion, peripheral edema, and NT-proBNP levels >300 ng/L were randomized to either decongestion therapy guided by daily IVC ultrasound plus clinical assessment or clinical assessment alone. The primary endpoint was the change in NT-proBNP levels from baseline to discharge. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized, of which 327 were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The between-group difference in primary endpoint of change in NT-proBNP levels was 5.4% (95% CI: −9.4% to 22.6%; P = 0.58). Safety events were numerically less frequent in the IVC ultrasound–guided group. No difference between groups was consistently observed in secondary endpoints with similar rates of hemoconcentration and intensity of diuretic treatment. Conclusions: Additional ultrasound evaluation of IVC diameters did not improve decongestion treatment compared with clinical assessment alone among patients admitted for ADHF. (Ultrasound Evaluation of the IVC in Addition to Clinical Assessment to Guide Decongestion in ADHF [CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10]; NCT03140566).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015319449
U2 - 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102578
DO - 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102578
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 40929999
AN - SCOPUS:105015319449
SN - 2213-1779
VL - 13
JO - JACC: Heart Failure
JF - JACC: Heart Failure
IS - 10
M1 - 102578
ER -