TY - JOUR
T1 - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator use for primary prevention in ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart disease - Indications in the post-DANISH trial era: Results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey
AU - Haugaa, Kristina H.
AU - Tilz, Roland
AU - Boveda, Serge
AU - Dobreanu, Dan
AU - Sciaraffia, Elena
AU - Mansourati, Jacques
AU - Papiashvili, Giorgi
AU - Dagres, Nikolaos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the standard of care for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high-risk patients. For primary prevention of SCD, in patients with ischaemic heart disease, there is more robust data on the effect of ICD therapy compared with patients with non-ischaemic heart disease, but current real-life practice may differ substantially. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association survey was to evaluate the clinical practice regarding implantation of ICD for primary prevention among European countries in patients with non-ischaemic and ischaemic heart disease. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the impact of the results of the recently published DANISH trial on clinical practice among European countries. In total, 48 centres from 17 different countries responded to the questionnaire. The majority did not implant ICD for primary prevention on a regular basis in patients with non-ischaemic heart disease despite current guidelines. Also, centres have changed their indications after the recent report on the efficacy of ICD in these patients. In patients with ischaemic heart disease, the guidelines for primary prevention ICD were followed on a regular basis, and no relevant change in indications were reported.
AB - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the standard of care for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high-risk patients. For primary prevention of SCD, in patients with ischaemic heart disease, there is more robust data on the effect of ICD therapy compared with patients with non-ischaemic heart disease, but current real-life practice may differ substantially. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association survey was to evaluate the clinical practice regarding implantation of ICD for primary prevention among European countries in patients with non-ischaemic and ischaemic heart disease. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the impact of the results of the recently published DANISH trial on clinical practice among European countries. In total, 48 centres from 17 different countries responded to the questionnaire. The majority did not implant ICD for primary prevention on a regular basis in patients with non-ischaemic heart disease despite current guidelines. Also, centres have changed their indications after the recent report on the efficacy of ICD in these patients. In patients with ischaemic heart disease, the guidelines for primary prevention ICD were followed on a regular basis, and no relevant change in indications were reported.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019102406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/europace/eux089
DO - 10.1093/europace/eux089
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 28431077
AN - SCOPUS:85019102406
SN - 1099-5129
VL - 19
SP - 660
EP - 664
JO - Europace
JF - Europace
IS - 4
ER -