TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of incubation method on the release of growth factors in non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP, Ca 2+ -activated PRP, PRF and A-PRF
AU - Steller, Daniel
AU - Herbst, Nele
AU - Pries, Ralph
AU - Juhl, David
AU - Hakim, Samer G.
N1 - Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different incubation methods on the growth factor content of lysates of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), advanced-platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) products. A comparison of related studies suggests that the method of sample preparation has a significant influence on growth factor content. There are few reports on the comparison of non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP, Ca 2+ -activated PRP, A-PRF, and PRF, along with a lack of information on the release of PDGF-BB, TGF-β1, and VEGF among the different incubation methods. The lysate preparation was made of non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP, Ca 2+ -activated PRP, PRF, and A-PRF, using a room-temperature, 37 °C, or freeze–thaw–freeze incubation method. Afterwards the VEGF, PDGF-BB, and TGF-β1 content was investigated by running ELISA tests. Growth factor levels were significantly increased in the non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP with freeze–thaw–freeze incubation, and in the PRF preparation there was a significant disadvantage to using room temperature incubation for releasing growth factors. In conclusion, the freeze–thaw–freeze method is sufficient for releasing growth factors, and calcium activation is not necessary. Finally, the study demonstrates the possibility of preparing PRP products from platelet concentrates, so that preoperative blood sampling might not be required.
AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different incubation methods on the growth factor content of lysates of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), advanced-platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) products. A comparison of related studies suggests that the method of sample preparation has a significant influence on growth factor content. There are few reports on the comparison of non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP, Ca 2+ -activated PRP, A-PRF, and PRF, along with a lack of information on the release of PDGF-BB, TGF-β1, and VEGF among the different incubation methods. The lysate preparation was made of non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP, Ca 2+ -activated PRP, PRF, and A-PRF, using a room-temperature, 37 °C, or freeze–thaw–freeze incubation method. Afterwards the VEGF, PDGF-BB, and TGF-β1 content was investigated by running ELISA tests. Growth factor levels were significantly increased in the non-Ca 2+ -activated PRP with freeze–thaw–freeze incubation, and in the PRF preparation there was a significant disadvantage to using room temperature incubation for releasing growth factors. In conclusion, the freeze–thaw–freeze method is sufficient for releasing growth factors, and calcium activation is not necessary. Finally, the study demonstrates the possibility of preparing PRP products from platelet concentrates, so that preoperative blood sampling might not be required.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058530343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.017
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30578012
AN - SCOPUS:85058530343
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 47
SP - 365
EP - 372
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 2
ER -