TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of semester-specific teaching contents for dental ethics: development, testing and validation of a questionnaire
AU - Goetz, Katja
AU - Gutermuth, Ann Christine
AU - Wenz, Hans Jürgen
AU - Groß, Dominik
AU - Hertrampf, Katrin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/2/17
Y1 - 2021/2/17
N2 - Background: Although medical ethics is an indispensable part of dental education, it has not played a relevant role in the dental curriculum thus far. This study is aimed at developing and validating a questionnaire that identifies semester-specific ethical issues, in order to develop longitudinal ethic modules. Methods: March 2018 a workshop on item generation was coordinated, using Delphi method; followed by a cognitive testing with students (2nd, 4th, 10th semesters, n = 12). A pilot test was carried out with students from different semesters (n = 60). The distribution of response frequencies and missing values were determined. The questionnaire used for validation consisted of three dimensions: ethical knowledge, dealing with ethical issues, expectations in terms of teaching. The psychometric examination was carried out by preclinical students (n = 105) and clinical semesters (n = 110) January 2019. Results: After cognitive testing and piloting, some items were reformulated, so that a questionnaire with 127 items was used for validation. The individual dimensions were assigned to various factors with excellent to acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.72–0.96). Conclusion: The questionnaire has an acceptable to excellent consistency and suggests that the different dimensions are conclusive. With this questionnaire, ethical issues in dentistry can be mapped and teaching contents identified.
AB - Background: Although medical ethics is an indispensable part of dental education, it has not played a relevant role in the dental curriculum thus far. This study is aimed at developing and validating a questionnaire that identifies semester-specific ethical issues, in order to develop longitudinal ethic modules. Methods: March 2018 a workshop on item generation was coordinated, using Delphi method; followed by a cognitive testing with students (2nd, 4th, 10th semesters, n = 12). A pilot test was carried out with students from different semesters (n = 60). The distribution of response frequencies and missing values were determined. The questionnaire used for validation consisted of three dimensions: ethical knowledge, dealing with ethical issues, expectations in terms of teaching. The psychometric examination was carried out by preclinical students (n = 105) and clinical semesters (n = 110) January 2019. Results: After cognitive testing and piloting, some items were reformulated, so that a questionnaire with 127 items was used for validation. The individual dimensions were assigned to various factors with excellent to acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.72–0.96). Conclusion: The questionnaire has an acceptable to excellent consistency and suggests that the different dimensions are conclusive. With this questionnaire, ethical issues in dentistry can be mapped and teaching contents identified.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100987050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/06377c71-3f3c-3cc8-9d3e-a71d9124cf00/
U2 - 10.1186/s12909-021-02541-x
DO - 10.1186/s12909-021-02541-x
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33596879
AN - SCOPUS:85100987050
SN - 0308-0110
VL - 21
SP - 109
JO - BMC Medical Education
JF - BMC Medical Education
IS - 1
M1 - 109
ER -