Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hydrodynamic performance of the medtronic corevalve and the edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve in surgical bioprostheses: An in vitro valve-in-valve model

Alexander Sedaghat, Jan Malte Sinning, Marc Utzenrath, Pejman Farhadi Ghalati, Christoph Schmitz, Nikos Werner, Georg Nickenig, Eberhard Grube, Stephan Ensminger, Ulrich Steinseifer, Maximilian Kuetting*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is becoming a valuable option with promising clinical results in failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Sizing recommendations are based on size compatibility rather than on broad clinical data, in vitro measurements, or biomechanical evidence. The hemodynamic performance of transcatheter heart valves within degenerated surgical heart valves is unknown. Methods We evaluated the in vitro hydrodynamic performance of two commercially available transcatheter heart valves (Medtronic CoreValve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN] and Edwards SAPIEN XT [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA]) in two different bioprosthetic aortic valves (Edwards Perimount [Edwards Lifesciences] and St. Jude Trifecta [St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN]). Results Within the Edwards Perimount (23 mm) prosthesis, pressure gradients were higher for the SAPIEN XT compared with the CoreValve (11.2 ± 0.1 mm Hg versus 10.1 ± 0.1 mm Hg, p < 0.01), whereas effective orifice area (1.99 ± 0.01 cm2 versus 1.80 ± 0.01 cm2, p < 0.01) and total paravalvular leakage (9.0% ± 1.0% versus 5.4% ± 1.3%, p < 0.01) were increased when using the CoreValve. Similarly, measurements in the St. Jude Trifecta revealed higher transvalvular pressure gradients (13.0 ± 0.2 mm Hg versus 10.9 ± 0.3 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and lower effective orifice area for the SAPIEN XT compared with the CoreValve. However, total relative regurgitation was higher with SAPIEN XT as compared with the CoreValve in St. Jude Trifecta prostheses (11.2% ± 1.4% versus 8.3% ± 0.9%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Both transcatheter heart valve prostheses performed well in the described valve-in-valve settings. Hydrodynamic results were in line with the International Organization for Standardization standards for all configurations. The observed differences indicate a necessity for preclinical valve-in-valve tests in addition to clinical long-term data about longevity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume101
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)118-124
Number of pages7
ISSN0003-4975
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydrodynamic performance of the medtronic corevalve and the edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve in surgical bioprostheses: An in vitro valve-in-valve model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this