TY - JOUR
T1 - HYAL4-V1/chondroitinase (chase) drives gemcitabine resistance and predicts chemotherapy failure in patients with bladder cancer
AU - Hasanali, Sarrah L.
AU - Morera, Daley S.
AU - Racine, Ronny R.
AU - Hennig, Martin
AU - Ghosh, Santu
AU - Lopez, Luis E.
AU - Hupe, Marie C.
AU - Escudero, Diogo O.
AU - Wang, Jiaojiao
AU - Zhu, Huabin
AU - Sarcan, Semih
AU - Azih, Ijeoma
AU - Zhou, Michael
AU - Jordan, Andre R.
AU - Terris, Martha K.
AU - Kuczyk, Markus A.
AU - Merseburger, Axel S.
AU - Lokeshwar, Vinata B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Purpose: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens are first-line for several advanced cancers. Because of better tolerability, gemcitabine þ cisplatin is a preferred neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and/or palliative chemotherapy regimen for advanced bladder cancer. Nevertheless, predicting treatment failure and overcoming resistance remain unmet clinical needs. We discovered that splice variant (V1) of HYAL-4 is a first-in-class eukaryotic chondroitinase (Chase), and CD44 is its major substrate. V1 is upregulated in bladder cancer and drives a malignant phenotype. In this study, we investigated whether V1 drives chemotherapy resistance. Experimental Design: V1 expression was measured in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) specimens by qRT-PCR and IHC. HYAL-4 wild-type (Wt) and V1 were stably expressed or silenced in normal urothelial and three bladder cancer cell lines. Transfectants were analyzed for chemoresistance and associated mechanism in preclinical models. Results: V1 levels in MIBC specimens of patients who developed metastasis, predicted response to gemcitabine þ cisplatin adjuvant/salvage treatment and disease-specific mortality. V1-expressing bladder cells were resistant to gemcitabine but not to cisplatin. V1 expression neither affected gemcitabine influx nor the drug-efflux transporters. Instead, V1 increased gemcitabine metabolism and subsequent efflux of difluorodeoxyuridine, by upregulating cytidine deaminase (CDA) expression through increased CD44–JAK2/STAT3 signaling. CDA inhibitor tetrahydrouridine resensitized V1-expressing cells to gemcitabine. While gemcitabine (25–50 mg/kg) inhibited bladder cancer xenograft growth, V1-expressing tumors were resistant. Low-dose combination of gemcitabine and tetrahydrouridine abrogated the growth of V1 tumors with minimal toxicity. Conclusions: V1/Chase drives gemcitabine resistance and potentially predicts gemcitabine þ cisplatin failure. CDA inhibition resensitizes V1-expressing tumors to gemcitabine. Because several chemotherapy regimens include gemcitabine, our study could have broad significance.
AB - Purpose: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens are first-line for several advanced cancers. Because of better tolerability, gemcitabine þ cisplatin is a preferred neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and/or palliative chemotherapy regimen for advanced bladder cancer. Nevertheless, predicting treatment failure and overcoming resistance remain unmet clinical needs. We discovered that splice variant (V1) of HYAL-4 is a first-in-class eukaryotic chondroitinase (Chase), and CD44 is its major substrate. V1 is upregulated in bladder cancer and drives a malignant phenotype. In this study, we investigated whether V1 drives chemotherapy resistance. Experimental Design: V1 expression was measured in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) specimens by qRT-PCR and IHC. HYAL-4 wild-type (Wt) and V1 were stably expressed or silenced in normal urothelial and three bladder cancer cell lines. Transfectants were analyzed for chemoresistance and associated mechanism in preclinical models. Results: V1 levels in MIBC specimens of patients who developed metastasis, predicted response to gemcitabine þ cisplatin adjuvant/salvage treatment and disease-specific mortality. V1-expressing bladder cells were resistant to gemcitabine but not to cisplatin. V1 expression neither affected gemcitabine influx nor the drug-efflux transporters. Instead, V1 increased gemcitabine metabolism and subsequent efflux of difluorodeoxyuridine, by upregulating cytidine deaminase (CDA) expression through increased CD44–JAK2/STAT3 signaling. CDA inhibitor tetrahydrouridine resensitized V1-expressing cells to gemcitabine. While gemcitabine (25–50 mg/kg) inhibited bladder cancer xenograft growth, V1-expressing tumors were resistant. Low-dose combination of gemcitabine and tetrahydrouridine abrogated the growth of V1 tumors with minimal toxicity. Conclusions: V1/Chase drives gemcitabine resistance and potentially predicts gemcitabine þ cisplatin failure. CDA inhibition resensitizes V1-expressing tumors to gemcitabine. Because several chemotherapy regimens include gemcitabine, our study could have broad significance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111686435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0422
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0422
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 34031055
AN - SCOPUS:85111686435
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 27
SP - 4410
EP - 4421
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 15
ER -