Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words

Matthias Gross; Tessa Say; Michael Kleingers; Harald Clahsen; Thomas F. Münte

doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3

Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words

Matthias Gross, Tessa Say, Michael Kleingers, Harald Clahsen, Thomas F. Münte

Department of Neurology

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials were recorded while 12 Italian-speaking subjects read correctly and incorrectly inflected verb forms. Participle forms of three types of verbs were investigated: 1st conjugation verbs (parlato 'spoken'), 3rd conjugation verbs (dormito 'slept'), and irregular 2nd conjugation verbs (preso 'taken'). We compared correct and incorrect participle forms; the latter had stem formation errors and/or incorrect participle endings. Event-related potentials (ERP) showed different responses to incorrect regular and incorrect irregular participle forms: incorrect irregulars (*prendato instead of preso) elicited a widespread negativity, whereas incorrect regulars (*parlito, *dormato) produced no effect. This difference replicates previous results on German inflection and supports the linguistic distinction between lexically-based and rule-based inflection.

Original language	English
Journal	Neuroscience Letters
Volume	241
Issue number	2-3
Pages (from-to)	83-86
Number of pages	4
ISSN	0304-3940
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3
Publication status	Published - 30.01.1998

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research Areas and Centers

Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Access to Document

10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3

Cite this

@article{042f5ef8c41a4baa9ea51bfc13ddaaa5,

title = "Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words",

abstract = "Event-related brain potentials were recorded while 12 Italian-speaking subjects read correctly and incorrectly inflected verb forms. Participle forms of three types of verbs were investigated: 1st conjugation verbs (parlato 'spoken'), 3rd conjugation verbs (dormito 'slept'), and irregular 2nd conjugation verbs (preso 'taken'). We compared correct and incorrect participle forms; the latter had stem formation errors and/or incorrect participle endings. Event-related potentials (ERP) showed different responses to incorrect regular and incorrect irregular participle forms: incorrect irregulars (*prendato instead of preso) elicited a widespread negativity, whereas incorrect regulars (*parlito, *dormato) produced no effect. This difference replicates previous results on German inflection and supports the linguistic distinction between lexically-based and rule-based inflection.",

author = "Matthias Gross and Tessa Say and Michael Kleingers and Harald Clahsen and \{F. M{\"u}nte\}, Thomas",

year = "1998",

month = jan,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3",

language = "English",

volume = "241",

pages = "83--86",

journal = "Neuroscience Letters",

issn = "0304-3940",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words

AU - Gross, Matthias

AU - Say, Tessa

AU - Kleingers, Michael

AU - Clahsen, Harald

AU - F. Münte, Thomas

PY - 1998/1/30

Y1 - 1998/1/30

N2 - Event-related brain potentials were recorded while 12 Italian-speaking subjects read correctly and incorrectly inflected verb forms. Participle forms of three types of verbs were investigated: 1st conjugation verbs (parlato 'spoken'), 3rd conjugation verbs (dormito 'slept'), and irregular 2nd conjugation verbs (preso 'taken'). We compared correct and incorrect participle forms; the latter had stem formation errors and/or incorrect participle endings. Event-related potentials (ERP) showed different responses to incorrect regular and incorrect irregular participle forms: incorrect irregulars (*prendato instead of preso) elicited a widespread negativity, whereas incorrect regulars (*parlito, *dormato) produced no effect. This difference replicates previous results on German inflection and supports the linguistic distinction between lexically-based and rule-based inflection.

AB - Event-related brain potentials were recorded while 12 Italian-speaking subjects read correctly and incorrectly inflected verb forms. Participle forms of three types of verbs were investigated: 1st conjugation verbs (parlato 'spoken'), 3rd conjugation verbs (dormito 'slept'), and irregular 2nd conjugation verbs (preso 'taken'). We compared correct and incorrect participle forms; the latter had stem formation errors and/or incorrect participle endings. Event-related potentials (ERP) showed different responses to incorrect regular and incorrect irregular participle forms: incorrect irregulars (*prendato instead of preso) elicited a widespread negativity, whereas incorrect regulars (*parlito, *dormato) produced no effect. This difference replicates previous results on German inflection and supports the linguistic distinction between lexically-based and rule-based inflection.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0032579503

U2 - 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3

DO - 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 9507926

AN - SCOPUS:0032579503

SN - 0304-3940

VL - 241

SP - 83

EP - 86

JO - Neuroscience Letters

JF - Neuroscience Letters

IS - 2-3

ER -

Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words

Abstract

UN SDGs

Research Areas and Centers

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this