TY - JOUR
T1 - How to do it-laparoscopic resection rectopexy
AU - Roblick, Uwe Johannes
AU - Bader, Franz Georg
AU - Jungbluth, Thomas
AU - Laubert, Tilman
AU - Bruch, Hans Peter
PY - 2011/8/1
Y1 - 2011/8/1
N2 - Introduction: A variety of surgical strategies have been suggested and many surgical techniques, both abdominal and perineal, have been introduced for treatment of rectal prolapse. All these techniques and approaches are based on the attempt to restore the normal anatomy and physiologic function. Methods: In 1992, Berman et al. published the first laparoscopically performed rectopexy. Meanwhile, many different minimally invasive procedures have been described. Throughout the past century, more than 100 different surgical techniques have been introduced to treat patients with rectal prolapse. Unfortunately, there is still lack of one generally accepted standard technique for the surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. Results and discussion: Our current data strongly supports laparoscopic resection rectopexy to be a safe, fast, and very effective procedure to improve function in patients with rectal prolapse. More evaluations of long-term outcome are needed that focus on each particular laparoscopic procedure to adequately compare different techniques. The indication to perform a laparoscopic resection rectopexy in patients with a previous perineal procedure and a recurrent prolapse should be stated critically because these patients seem to have a high risk to develop yet another recurrence.
AB - Introduction: A variety of surgical strategies have been suggested and many surgical techniques, both abdominal and perineal, have been introduced for treatment of rectal prolapse. All these techniques and approaches are based on the attempt to restore the normal anatomy and physiologic function. Methods: In 1992, Berman et al. published the first laparoscopically performed rectopexy. Meanwhile, many different minimally invasive procedures have been described. Throughout the past century, more than 100 different surgical techniques have been introduced to treat patients with rectal prolapse. Unfortunately, there is still lack of one generally accepted standard technique for the surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. Results and discussion: Our current data strongly supports laparoscopic resection rectopexy to be a safe, fast, and very effective procedure to improve function in patients with rectal prolapse. More evaluations of long-term outcome are needed that focus on each particular laparoscopic procedure to adequately compare different techniques. The indication to perform a laparoscopic resection rectopexy in patients with a previous perineal procedure and a recurrent prolapse should be stated critically because these patients seem to have a high risk to develop yet another recurrence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052826896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00423-011-0796-5
DO - 10.1007/s00423-011-0796-5
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 21562864
AN - SCOPUS:80052826896
SN - 1435-2443
VL - 396
SP - 851
EP - 855
JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -