TY - JOUR
T1 - High incidence of heparin-induced allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in pregnancy
AU - Schindewolf, Marc
AU - Gobst, Corinna
AU - Kroll, Hartmut
AU - Recke, Andreas
AU - Louwen, Frank
AU - Wolter, Manfred
AU - Kaufmann, Roland
AU - Boehncke, Wolf Henning
AU - Lindhoff-Last, Edelgard
AU - Ludwig, Ralf J.
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Background: Among the most frequent adverse effects of subcutaneous heparin treatment, heparin-induced skin lesions occur with an incidence of 10.3% in nonpregnant female patients. Clinical observations suggest an even higher risk during pregnancy. Objectives: We sought to determine the incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin reactions during pregnancy in a prospective cohort study. Methods: Pregnant women with subcutaneous heparin treatment were prospectively examined for skin reactions. If a skin lesion was observed, further diagnostics were performed (skin biopsy, subcutaneous provocation, clinical/laboratory assessment for thrombosis, bleeding, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [HIT]). Safety parameters were also analyzed (cross-allergies, frequency of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, HIT, and pregnancy outcome). Results: Among 111 pregnant patients, 22 (19.8%) had heparininduced skin reactions (95% CI, 13% to 29%). All lesions were caused by allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions and not by HIT or other rare conditions. The median time of onset was 50.5 days (range, 5-184 days). The crossreactivity rate was 33.3%. While nadroparin treatment exhibited a higher DTH risk than dalteparin (hazard ratio [HR], 26.7; 95% CI, 3.4-211.0; P =.00187), enoxaparin treatment was not significantly different from dalteparin treatment (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 0.3-96.1; P =.238). Three thromboembolic events and 1 major bleeding event occurred. Conclusions: Among patients receiving long-term heparin anticoagulation during pregnancy, heparin-induced skin lesions are frequent (incidence, 19.8%) and are all caused by allergic DTH reactions. Nadroparin has the highest frequency of skin lesions (approximately 65% at 100 days), which is significantly higher than that of dalteparin (HR, 26.7). Therefore nadroparin use should be avoided in pregnancy when possible.
AB - Background: Among the most frequent adverse effects of subcutaneous heparin treatment, heparin-induced skin lesions occur with an incidence of 10.3% in nonpregnant female patients. Clinical observations suggest an even higher risk during pregnancy. Objectives: We sought to determine the incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin reactions during pregnancy in a prospective cohort study. Methods: Pregnant women with subcutaneous heparin treatment were prospectively examined for skin reactions. If a skin lesion was observed, further diagnostics were performed (skin biopsy, subcutaneous provocation, clinical/laboratory assessment for thrombosis, bleeding, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [HIT]). Safety parameters were also analyzed (cross-allergies, frequency of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, HIT, and pregnancy outcome). Results: Among 111 pregnant patients, 22 (19.8%) had heparininduced skin reactions (95% CI, 13% to 29%). All lesions were caused by allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions and not by HIT or other rare conditions. The median time of onset was 50.5 days (range, 5-184 days). The crossreactivity rate was 33.3%. While nadroparin treatment exhibited a higher DTH risk than dalteparin (hazard ratio [HR], 26.7; 95% CI, 3.4-211.0; P =.00187), enoxaparin treatment was not significantly different from dalteparin treatment (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 0.3-96.1; P =.238). Three thromboembolic events and 1 major bleeding event occurred. Conclusions: Among patients receiving long-term heparin anticoagulation during pregnancy, heparin-induced skin lesions are frequent (incidence, 19.8%) and are all caused by allergic DTH reactions. Nadroparin has the highest frequency of skin lesions (approximately 65% at 100 days), which is significantly higher than that of dalteparin (HR, 26.7). Therefore nadroparin use should be avoided in pregnancy when possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882832922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.047
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.047
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84882832922
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 132
SP - 131
EP - 139
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 1
ER -