Guiding first-line treatment decisions in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a global survey

Enrique Grande*, Joaquim Bellmunt, Syed A. Hussain, Mubarak M. Al Mansour, Aristotle Bamias, Philippe Barthélémy, David J. Benjamin, Normand Blais, Maria T. Bourlon, Daniel Castellano, Pongwut Danchaivijitr, Mauricio Fernandez Lazzaro, Patrizia Giannatempo, Félix Guerrero-Ramos, Roberto Iacovelli, Philipp Ivanyi, Eun Hee Jung, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Ray Manneh, Joana C. MarinhoNobuaki Matsubara, Axel S. Merseburger, Deborah Mukherji, Chandler H. Park, Ben Tran, Karine Martins Da Trindade, Yüksel Ürün, Ashish M. Kamat, Alison J. Birtle

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background: Enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab (EV-P) has become the new standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), based on its superior efficacy over platinum-based chemotherapy. As this regimen is increasingly adopted in routine care, treatment decisions may often occur in sites without dedicated genitourinary oncology expertise. This global survey aimed to explore how physicians perceive clinical factors that may influence the safe and effective use of EV-P in daily practice. Material and methods: A panel of international physicians with experience in treating patients with genitourinary cancers developed a 17-question survey addressing practice settings, experience in managing aUC, and clinical considerations relevant to the use of EV-P. The participants were recruited through a network-based convenience sampling method. The responses were descriptively analyzed. Results: A total of 201 genitourinary physicians from 32 countries completed the questionnaire. The most frequently cited potential absolute contraindications were sensory or motor neuropathy grade≥2 (64.2%), ECOG-PS≥3 (59.2%), and non–urothelial component >50% of the tissue sample (59.2%). Other notable concerns included severe corneal/retinal abnormalities, HbA1c >11%, severe skin comorbidities, liver impairment grade ≥2, and dialysis dependence. Conclusions and relevance: This survey provides practical insights into real-world physician perspectives on patient selection for EV-P. The findings highlight the need for guidance to support personalized risk assessment, facilitate early identification of patients who may require enhanced monitoring, and optimize safe integration of EV-P into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberoyaf333
JournalOncologist
Volume30
Issue number10
ISSN1083-7159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.10.2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.22-23 Reproductive Medicine, Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guiding first-line treatment decisions in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a global survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this