Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game

Gabriele Bellucci, Tim Hahn, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Frank Krueger*

*Corresponding author for this work
10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Economic games are used to elicit a social, conflictual situation in which people have to make decisions weighing self-related and collective interests. Combining these games with task-based fMRI has been shown to be successful in investigating the neural underpinnings of cooperative behaviors. However, it remains elusive to which extent resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) represents an individual’s propensity to prosocial behaviors in the context of economic games. Here, we investigated whether task-free RSFC predicts individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocate in a one-round trust game (TG) employing a prediction-analytics framework. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocity could be predicted by individual differences in the RSFC. Different subnetworks of the default-mode network associated with mentalizing exclusively predicted trust and reciprocity. Moreover, reciprocity was further predicted by the frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks associated with cognitive control and saliency, respectively. Our results contribute to a better understanding of how complex social behaviors are enrooted in large-scale intrinsic brain dynamics, which may represent neuromarkers for impairment of prosocial behavior in mental health disorders.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume19
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)165-176
Number of pages12
ISSN1530-7026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.02.2019

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this