TY - JOUR
T1 - Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial
AU - ECLS-SHOCK Investigators
AU - Thiele, Holger
AU - Freund, Anne
AU - Gimenez, Maria Rubini
AU - de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
AU - Akin, Ibrahim
AU - Pöss, Janine
AU - Feistritzer, Hans Josef
AU - Fuernau, Georg
AU - Graf, Tobias
AU - Nef, Holger
AU - Hamm, Christian
AU - Böhm, Michael
AU - Lauten, Alexander
AU - Schulze, P. Christian
AU - Voigt, Ingo
AU - Nordbeck, Peter
AU - Felix, Stephan B.
AU - Abel, Peter
AU - Baldus, Stephan
AU - Laufs, Ulrich
AU - Lenk, Karsten
AU - Landmesser, Ulf
AU - Skurk, Carsten
AU - Pieske, Burkert
AU - Tschöpe, Carsten
AU - Hennersdorf, Marcus
AU - Wengenmayer, Tobias
AU - Preusch, Michael
AU - Maier, Lars S.
AU - Jung, Christian
AU - Kelm, Malte
AU - Clemmensen, Peter
AU - Westermann, Dirk
AU - Seidler, Tim
AU - Schieffer, Bernhard
AU - Rassaf, Tienush
AU - Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
AU - Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
AU - Meincke, Felix
AU - Seyfarth, Melchior
AU - Kersten, Alexander
AU - Rottbauer, Wolfgang
AU - Boekstegers, Peter
AU - Müllenbach, Ralf
AU - Dengler, Thomas
AU - Kadel, Christoph
AU - Schempf, Benjamin
AU - Karagiannidis, Christian
AU - Hopf, Hans Bernd
AU - Desch, Steffen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. Study Design: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. Conclusions: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
AB - Background: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. Study Design: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. Conclusions: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099941476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33428901
AN - SCOPUS:85099941476
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 234
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
ER -