Experimentally induced pain and paresthesia respond differently to parameter changes of cuff-based compression in pain-free young individuals

Jacek Skalski*, Sylwia Swoboda, Tibor M. Szikszay, Piotr Wodarski, Andrzej Bieniek, Kerstin Luedtke, Wacław M. Adamczyk

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Neuropathic pain is a significant therapeutic challenge due to the co-occurrence with other neurological symptoms such as paresthesia. Human-based models such as cuff algometry can enhance our understanding of pain-paresthesia relationships. This experiment aimed to characterize (psychophysically) pain and paresthesia evoked by stimuli of different temporal and intensity parameters and to demonstrate the reliability of experimental induction of these two symptoms using cuff algometry. Forty participants, aged 18–35, were exposed to mechanical pressure stimuli at three intensities (100, 150, 200 mmHg) and three durations (90, 120, 150 s). Skin Conductance (SC) was continuously monitored, and participants rated pain and paresthesia in real-time using a computerized visual analog scale. The General Linear Model analysis revealed significant differences in paresthesia across all durations (p<0.01), but not all intensities, as paresthesia did not increase from 150 to 200 mmHg (p>0.05). Conversely, pain responses showed significant differences across all pressure intensities (p<0.05) but not durations, as pain did not increase from 90 to 120 and from 120 to 150 s (p>0.05). No interaction effects were found for either symptom. SC analysis showed no significant main or interaction effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate to excellent reliability for pain and paresthesia induction across different durations and intensities (ICC: 0.51–0.91), while SC showed poor to good reliability (ICC: 0.17–0.79). In conclusion, computerized cuff algometry seems to be an effective and reliable method for simultaneously inducing and assessing pain and paresthesia, revealing that these symptoms follow different patterns based on pressure duration and intensity. Perspective: This study demonstrates that pain and paresthesia respond differently to varying intensities and durations of mechanical pressure, revealing their distinct psychophysical characteristics. This model can advance the understanding of neuropathic conditions and aid the development of more targeted therapeutic approaches for both pain and paresthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105339
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume29
Pages (from-to)105339
ISSN1526-5900
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2025

Funding

The authors declare no conflict of interest. JS is supported by grant from Polish National Science Center (2020/37/B/HS6/04210). TMS is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) — 493000854. WMA is supported by grant from Polish National Science Center (2020/37/B/HS6/04196).

FundersFunder number
Narodowe Centrum Nauki2020/37/B/HS6/04210
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft2020/37/B/HS6/04196, 493000854

    Research Areas and Centers

    • Health Sciences

    DFG Research Classification Scheme

    • 2.23-08 Human Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Experimentally induced pain and paresthesia respond differently to parameter changes of cuff-based compression in pain-free young individuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this