Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ewing's sarcoma of the femur. Prognosis in 69 patients treated by the CESS group

Toshifumi Ozaki*, Axel Hillmann, Christiane Hoffmann, Christian Rübe, Barbara Dockhorn-Dworniczak, Sebastian Blasius, Jürgen Dunst, Jörn Treuner, Herbert Jürgens, Winfried Winkelmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

We reviewed the treatment outcome of 69 patient's with Ewing's sarcoma of the femur. The patients received chemotherapy according to the CESS 81 (n 14), CESS 86 (n 43), and CESS 91P (n 12) protocols. The 10-year relapse-free survival rates were 36%, 65%, and 65% (p = 0.01). 68 patients received local treatment. The primary tumor was treated by surgery without radiotherapy in 28 patients; 1 developed a local recurrence and 7 metastases. 10 patients received radiotherapy alone; 4 developed metastases and 4 local recurrences and metastases. 30 cases had a combination of surgery and radiotherapy; 7 developed metastases and 1 a local recurrence and metastasis. The survival of patients after radiotherapy alone was worse than that of patients after surgery with/without radiotherapy (p = 0.005). Pathological fractures (n 16) did not influence the prognosis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica
Volume68
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)20-24
Number of pages5
ISSN0001-6470
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Funding

The authors thank Mrs. S. Jabar for the statistical analysis and her help in preparing the manuscript. Funds were re- ceived in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding sources were the “Deutsche Krebshilfe” (grant # M43/92/Jii2) and EC BIOMED 1’ (grant # BMHl -CT92-1341).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ewing's sarcoma of the femur. Prognosis in 69 patients treated by the CESS group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this