TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolution of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (part 1): from first developments to mechanism-driven therapy concepts
AU - Klimek, Ludger
AU - Brehler, Randolf
AU - Hamelmann, Eckard
AU - Kopp, Matthias
AU - Ring, Johannes
AU - Treudler, Regina
AU - Jakob, Thilo
AU - Worm, Margitta
AU - Pfaar, Oliver
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interests L. Klimek has received research funds from the following companies: ALK-Abelló, Denmark; Aller-gopharma, Germany; Bionorica, Germany; Biomay, Austria; Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany; Circassia, USA; Staller-genes, France; HAL, The Netherlands; Allergy Therapeutics/Bencard, Great Britain/Germany; Hartington, Spain; Lofarma, Italy and MEDA, Sweden; MSD, USA; Novartis, Switzerland; LETI, Spain; ROXALL, Germany; GlaxoSmithK-line, Great Britain; Cytos, Switzerland and Curalogic, Denmark. In addition, L. Klimek is a consultant for AllergyTher-apeutics/Bencard, UK/Germany; HAL, The Netherlands; MEDA, Germany; and Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany. R. Brehler has received research funding from the following companies: Allergopharma, Bencard, and Biotech Tools, as well as Genentech, LETI, Novartis, and Circassia. He has also been a speaker for ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, Almirall, Astra Zeneca, Bencard, the German Society for the Promotion of Dermatological Research and Training (Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Dermatologischen Forschung und Fortbil-dung), the German Society for Information and Organization (Gesellschaft für Information und Organisation), as well as GlaxoSmithKline, Dr. Pfleger, HAL, LETI, MedUpdate, Merck, Novartis, The Otorhinolaryngology Association (Oto-Rhino-Laryngologischer Verein), Pierre Fabre, Pohl Boskamp, Stal-lergenes, and Thermo-Fischer. R. Brehler has worked as a consultant for: Allergopharma, Bencard, HAL, LETI, and Novartis. Eckard Hamelmann has received research funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF), North Rhine-Westphalia State Ministry of Research (Landesforschungsministerium Nordrhein-Westfalen) and the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft, DFG). He has also given lectures and been a consultant for Allergy Therapeutics/Bencard, Great Britain/ Germany; ALK-Abelló, Denmark; Allergopharma, Germany; Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany; GlaxoSmithKline, Great Britain; HAL Allergy, The Netherlands; LETI, Spain; Lo-farma, Italy; Novartis, Switzerland, and Stallergenes, France. Matthias Kopp received fees from ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, LETI, and Novartis, as well as from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Infectopharm during the period of this study. J. Ring has served on advisory boards for ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, Bencard, HAL, and Novartis. R. Treudler states that she received fees from ALK-Abelló and LETI during the period of this study. Over and above this study, she has received fees from Sanofi Aventis and Novartis. T. Jakob has received the following grants and funding for projects other than the work submitted here: research grants and fees from ALK-Abelló, Germany; fees and nonfinancial support from Bencard/Allergy Therapeutics, Germany; research grants, fees, and nonfinancial support from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sweden, as well as fees from Stallergenes, Germany; research grants, fees, and nonfinancial support from Allergopharma, Germany, and research grants and fees from Novartis, Germany. T. Jakob has also received fees from Springer Nature, as well as nonfinancial support from the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergie und klinische Immunologie). O. Pfaar reports grants and personal fees from ALK-Abelló, grants and personal fees from Allergopharma, grants and personal fees from Stallergenes Greer, grants and personal fees from HAL Allergy Holding B.V./HAL Al-lergie GmbH, grants and personal fees from Bencard Allergie GmbH/Allergy Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Lofarma, grants from Biomay, grants from Nuvo, grants from Circassia, grants and personal fees from ASIT Biotech Tools S.A., grants and personal fees from Laboratorios LETI/LETI Pharma, personal fees from Novartis Pharma, personal fees from MEDA Pharma, grants and personal fees from Anergis S.A., personal fees from Mobile Chamber Experts (a GA2LEN Partner), personal fees from Pohl-Boskamp, personal fees from Indoor Biotechnologies, grants from Glaxo Smith Kline, personal fees from Astellas Pharma Global, outside the submitted work. M. Worm reports fees for advisory boards and lecture activities from Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG, ALK-Abelló Arzneimittel GmbH, Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, HAL Allergie GmbH, Stallergenes GmbH, Bencard Allergie GmbH, LETI Pharma GmbH, outside the submitted work.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The development of this publication was financially supported by Allergopharma, Reinbek, Germany through an independent medical writing grant. The views and opinions described in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the grantor.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Background: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is the classic causal treatment method for IgE-mediated allergic respiratory disease. A growing understanding of the fundamentals of immunological mechanisms sets the path for further clinical improvement of this treatment. Innovations in SCIT comprise both treatment schedules and new forms of allergen extracts applied. Nonmodified allergen preparations in the form of aqueous or physically coupled (semidepot) extracts, as well as chemically modified allergens (allergoids) are currently on the market for SCIT in Germany. However, to date the clinical documentation of SCIT products in clinical studies is heterogeneous. Methods: A selective literature search was conducted in PubMed and Medline, and recent publications in German-language journals not available in these literature databases were also analyzed. This literature search comprised original and review articles both in German and in English. Results: SCIT is a long-established and well-documented treatment method for inhalant and insect venom allergies, with its efficacy and safety demonstrated in both the adult as well as in the pediatric population. In line with the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (TAV) several products for SCIT are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Treatment schedules are continuous year-round (perennial), preseasonal, and combined pre-/coseasonal. The initial up-dosing phase can be performed with standard, cluster or rush procedures. SCIT is particularly well established for frequently occurring inhalant allergens such as pollen from grasses, Betula sp. (birch, alder, hazel), house dust mites (Dermatophagoides sp.), and insect venoms (bee and wasp venoms). However, good data are also available for a number of other therapeutic allergens, e.g., weed pollen such as ragweed, mugwort, etc., molds, e.g., Alternaria, Cladosporium, etc., storage mites, and animal dander (e.g., cat). Moreover, further clinical investigations on new indications such as treatment effects on e.g., oral allergy syndrome or atopic dermatitis are currently underway. Conclusion: When adequately administered by physicians with allergological expertise, SCIT preparations are safe, well-tolerated, and clinically effective.
AB - Background: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is the classic causal treatment method for IgE-mediated allergic respiratory disease. A growing understanding of the fundamentals of immunological mechanisms sets the path for further clinical improvement of this treatment. Innovations in SCIT comprise both treatment schedules and new forms of allergen extracts applied. Nonmodified allergen preparations in the form of aqueous or physically coupled (semidepot) extracts, as well as chemically modified allergens (allergoids) are currently on the market for SCIT in Germany. However, to date the clinical documentation of SCIT products in clinical studies is heterogeneous. Methods: A selective literature search was conducted in PubMed and Medline, and recent publications in German-language journals not available in these literature databases were also analyzed. This literature search comprised original and review articles both in German and in English. Results: SCIT is a long-established and well-documented treatment method for inhalant and insect venom allergies, with its efficacy and safety demonstrated in both the adult as well as in the pediatric population. In line with the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (TAV) several products for SCIT are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Treatment schedules are continuous year-round (perennial), preseasonal, and combined pre-/coseasonal. The initial up-dosing phase can be performed with standard, cluster or rush procedures. SCIT is particularly well established for frequently occurring inhalant allergens such as pollen from grasses, Betula sp. (birch, alder, hazel), house dust mites (Dermatophagoides sp.), and insect venoms (bee and wasp venoms). However, good data are also available for a number of other therapeutic allergens, e.g., weed pollen such as ragweed, mugwort, etc., molds, e.g., Alternaria, Cladosporium, etc., storage mites, and animal dander (e.g., cat). Moreover, further clinical investigations on new indications such as treatment effects on e.g., oral allergy syndrome or atopic dermatitis are currently underway. Conclusion: When adequately administered by physicians with allergological expertise, SCIT preparations are safe, well-tolerated, and clinically effective.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064635298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40629-019-0092-4
DO - 10.1007/s40629-019-0092-4
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85064635298
SN - 2197-0378
VL - 28
SP - 78
EP - 95
JO - Allergo Journal International
JF - Allergo Journal International
IS - 3
ER -