Evaluation von Disease-Management-Programmen - Aktuelle Defizite, Anforderungen, Methoden

Ferdinand M. Gerlach; Martin Beyer; Joachim Szecsenyi; Heiner Raspe

Evaluation von Disease-Management-Programmen - Aktuelle Defizite, Anforderungen, Methoden

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluating of Disease Management Programmes - Current Deficits, Demands and Methods

Ferdinand M. Gerlach^*, Martin Beyer, Joachim Szecsenyi, Heiner Raspe

^*Corresponding author for this work

Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology

University of Kiel

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of disease management programmes is necessary and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. So far there has been extensive ambiguity as regards the precise definition of suitable strategies for the evaluation. Considering the scientific evaluation of the diabetes contract in North-Rhine current deficits of the evaluation of already existing programmes for chronically ill patients are exemplarily described. On the basis of international experience reasonable demands are discussed that ought to be accomplished when evaluating the effectiveness and benefit of the programmes. Taking the British Medical Research Council as an example, a four-step model will be suggested as a loophole in the methodological dilemma of varying suitable study designs, which allows for the adequate evaluation of even complex interventions.

Translated title of the contribution	Evaluating of Disease Management Programmes - Current Deficits, Demands and Methods
Original language	German
Journal	Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung
Volume	97
Issue number	7
Pages (from-to)	495-501
Number of pages	7
ISSN	1431-7621
Publication status	Published - 10.2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this

@article{204b14095367456793b874db761482a5,

title = "Evaluation von Disease-Management-Programmen - Aktuelle Defizite, Anforderungen, Methoden",

abstract = "The evaluation of disease management programmes is necessary and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. So far there has been extensive ambiguity as regards the precise definition of suitable strategies for the evaluation. Considering the scientific evaluation of the diabetes contract in North-Rhine current deficits of the evaluation of already existing programmes for chronically ill patients are exemplarily described. On the basis of international experience reasonable demands are discussed that ought to be accomplished when evaluating the effectiveness and benefit of the programmes. Taking the British Medical Research Council as an example, a four-step model will be suggested as a loophole in the methodological dilemma of varying suitable study designs, which allows for the adequate evaluation of even complex interventions.",

author = "Gerlach, \{Ferdinand M.\} and Martin Beyer and Joachim Szecsenyi and Heiner Raspe",

year = "2003",

month = oct,

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "97",

pages = "495--501",

journal = "Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung",

issn = "1431-7621",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation von Disease-Management-Programmen - Aktuelle Defizite, Anforderungen, Methoden

AU - Gerlach, Ferdinand M.

AU - Beyer, Martin

AU - Szecsenyi, Joachim

AU - Raspe, Heiner

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - The evaluation of disease management programmes is necessary and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. So far there has been extensive ambiguity as regards the precise definition of suitable strategies for the evaluation. Considering the scientific evaluation of the diabetes contract in North-Rhine current deficits of the evaluation of already existing programmes for chronically ill patients are exemplarily described. On the basis of international experience reasonable demands are discussed that ought to be accomplished when evaluating the effectiveness and benefit of the programmes. Taking the British Medical Research Council as an example, a four-step model will be suggested as a loophole in the methodological dilemma of varying suitable study designs, which allows for the adequate evaluation of even complex interventions.

AB - The evaluation of disease management programmes is necessary and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. So far there has been extensive ambiguity as regards the precise definition of suitable strategies for the evaluation. Considering the scientific evaluation of the diabetes contract in North-Rhine current deficits of the evaluation of already existing programmes for chronically ill patients are exemplarily described. On the basis of international experience reasonable demands are discussed that ought to be accomplished when evaluating the effectiveness and benefit of the programmes. Taking the British Medical Research Council as an example, a four-step model will be suggested as a loophole in the methodological dilemma of varying suitable study designs, which allows for the adequate evaluation of even complex interventions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0142183645

M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten

C2 - 14611145

AN - SCOPUS:0142183645

SN - 1431-7621

VL - 97

SP - 495

EP - 501

JO - Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

JF - Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

IS - 7

ER -

Evaluation von Disease-Management-Programmen - Aktuelle Defizite, Anforderungen, Methoden

Abstract

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this