TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of integrated hpv dna as individualized biomarkers for the detection of recurrent cin2/3 during post-treatment surveillance
AU - Hoyer, Heike
AU - Mehlhorn, Grit
AU - Scheungraber, Cornelia
AU - Hagemann, Ingke
AU - Hirchenhain, Christine
AU - Woelber, Linn
AU - Stolte, Claudia
AU - Hampl, Monika
AU - Scherbring, Sarah
AU - Denecke, Agnieszka
AU - Bartels, Janina
AU - Ebert, Andreas D.
AU - Meneder, Sabina
AU - Petzold, Annett
AU - Heller, Tabitha
AU - Heidtke, Karsten R.
AU - Schwarz, Elisabeth
AU - Stübs, Frederik
AU - Schütze, Stefanie
AU - Stange, Eva Lena
AU - Jaeger, Anna
AU - Martignoni, Franca
AU - Dellmann, Ansgar
AU - Rody, Achim
AU - Hillemanns, Peter
AU - Fehm, Tanja
AU - Petry, Karl Ulrich
AU - Böhmer, Gerd
AU - Schmalfeldt, Barbara
AU - Wimberger, Pauline
AU - Beckmann, Matthias W.
AU - Runnebaum, Ingo B.
AU - Dürst, Matthias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Purpose: Post-treatment follow-up in women with cervical pre-cancers (CIN3) is mandatory due to relapse in up to 10% of patients. Standard follow-up based on hrHPV-DNA/cytology co-testing has high sensitivity but limited specificity. The aim of our prospective, multicenter, observational study was to test the hypothesis that an individualized viral-cellular-junction test (vcj-PCR) combined with cytology has a lower false positive rate for the prediction of recurrence compared to standard co-testing. Methods: Pre-surgical cervical swabs served for the identification of HPV16/18 DNA integration sites by next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery were evaluated by cytology, hrHPV-DNA and the patients’ individual HPV-integration sites (vcj-PCR on the basis of NGS). Results: Integration sites were detected in 48 of 445 patients (10.8%), 39 of them had valid follow-up data. The false positive rate was 18.2% (95% CI 8.6–34.4%) for standard hrHPV/cytology at six months compared to 12.1% (95% CI 4.8–27.3%) for vcj-PCR/cytology, respectively (McNemar p = 0.50). Six patients developed recurrences (1 CIN2, 5 CIN3) during follow-up. Standard co-testing detected all, whereas vcj-PCR/cytology detected only five patients with recurrences. Data of 269 patients without evidence of HPV16/18 integration were subject to post-hoc analyses. Standard co-testing revealed a false positive rate of 15.7% (95% CI 11.7–20.7%) and predicted ten of fourteen recurrences at six months. Conclusions: Although highly specific on its own vcj-PCR could not detect all recurrent CIN2/3. Possible reasons for this unexpected result may be multifocal lesions, intratumoral heterogeneity with respect to HPV integration and/or incident CIN.
AB - Purpose: Post-treatment follow-up in women with cervical pre-cancers (CIN3) is mandatory due to relapse in up to 10% of patients. Standard follow-up based on hrHPV-DNA/cytology co-testing has high sensitivity but limited specificity. The aim of our prospective, multicenter, observational study was to test the hypothesis that an individualized viral-cellular-junction test (vcj-PCR) combined with cytology has a lower false positive rate for the prediction of recurrence compared to standard co-testing. Methods: Pre-surgical cervical swabs served for the identification of HPV16/18 DNA integration sites by next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery were evaluated by cytology, hrHPV-DNA and the patients’ individual HPV-integration sites (vcj-PCR on the basis of NGS). Results: Integration sites were detected in 48 of 445 patients (10.8%), 39 of them had valid follow-up data. The false positive rate was 18.2% (95% CI 8.6–34.4%) for standard hrHPV/cytology at six months compared to 12.1% (95% CI 4.8–27.3%) for vcj-PCR/cytology, respectively (McNemar p = 0.50). Six patients developed recurrences (1 CIN2, 5 CIN3) during follow-up. Standard co-testing detected all, whereas vcj-PCR/cytology detected only five patients with recurrences. Data of 269 patients without evidence of HPV16/18 integration were subject to post-hoc analyses. Standard co-testing revealed a false positive rate of 15.7% (95% CI 11.7–20.7%) and predicted ten of fourteen recurrences at six months. Conclusions: Although highly specific on its own vcj-PCR could not detect all recurrent CIN2/3. Possible reasons for this unexpected result may be multifocal lesions, intratumoral heterogeneity with respect to HPV integration and/or incident CIN.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108870112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13133309
DO - 10.3390/cancers13133309
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85108870112
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 13
M1 - 3309
ER -