TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular simulation training
T2 - a tool to increase enthusiasm for interventional radiology among medical students
AU - Stoehr, Fabian
AU - Schotten, Sebastian
AU - Pitton, Michael B.
AU - Dueber, Christoph
AU - Schmidt, Franziska
AU - Hansen, Nienke L.
AU - Baeßler, Bettina
AU - Kloeckner, Roman
AU - dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Objectives: Interventional radiology (IR) is a growing field but is underrepresented in most medical school curricula. We tested whether endovascular simulator training improves medical students’ attitudes towards IR. Materials and methods: We conducted this prospective study at two university medical centers; overall, 305 fourth-year medical students completed a 90-min IR course. The class consisted of theoretical and practical parts involving endovascular simulators. Students completed questionnaires before the course, after the theoretical and after the practical part. On a 7-point Likert scale, they rated their interest in IR, knowledge of IR, attractiveness of IR, and the likelihood to choose IR as subspecialty. We used a crossover design to prevent position-effect bias. Results: The seminar/simulator parts led to the improvement for all items compared with baseline: interest in IR (pre-course 5.2 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.5/5.7), knowledge of IR (pre-course 2.7 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.1/5.4), attractiveness of IR (pre-course 4.6 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 4.8/5.0), and the likelihood of choosing IR as a subspecialty (pre-course 3.3 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 3.8/4.1). Effect was significantly stronger for simulator training compared with that for seminar for all items (p < 0.05). For simulator training, subgroup analysis of students with pre-existing positive attitude showed considerable improvement regarding “interest in IR” (× 1.4), “knowledge of IR” (× 23), “attractiveness of IR” (× 2), and “likelihood to choose IR” (× 3.2) compared with pretest. Conclusion: Endovascular simulator training significantly improves students’ attitude towards IR regarding all items. Implementing such courses at a very early stage in the curriculum should be the first step to expose medical students to IR and push for IR. Key Points: • Dedicated IR-courses have a significant positive effect on students’ attitudes towards IR. • Simulator training is superior to a theoretical seminar in positively influencing students’ attitudes towards IR. • Implementing dedicated IR courses in medical school might ease recruitment problems in the field.
AB - Objectives: Interventional radiology (IR) is a growing field but is underrepresented in most medical school curricula. We tested whether endovascular simulator training improves medical students’ attitudes towards IR. Materials and methods: We conducted this prospective study at two university medical centers; overall, 305 fourth-year medical students completed a 90-min IR course. The class consisted of theoretical and practical parts involving endovascular simulators. Students completed questionnaires before the course, after the theoretical and after the practical part. On a 7-point Likert scale, they rated their interest in IR, knowledge of IR, attractiveness of IR, and the likelihood to choose IR as subspecialty. We used a crossover design to prevent position-effect bias. Results: The seminar/simulator parts led to the improvement for all items compared with baseline: interest in IR (pre-course 5.2 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.5/5.7), knowledge of IR (pre-course 2.7 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.1/5.4), attractiveness of IR (pre-course 4.6 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 4.8/5.0), and the likelihood of choosing IR as a subspecialty (pre-course 3.3 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 3.8/4.1). Effect was significantly stronger for simulator training compared with that for seminar for all items (p < 0.05). For simulator training, subgroup analysis of students with pre-existing positive attitude showed considerable improvement regarding “interest in IR” (× 1.4), “knowledge of IR” (× 23), “attractiveness of IR” (× 2), and “likelihood to choose IR” (× 3.2) compared with pretest. Conclusion: Endovascular simulator training significantly improves students’ attitude towards IR regarding all items. Implementing such courses at a very early stage in the curriculum should be the first step to expose medical students to IR and push for IR. Key Points: • Dedicated IR-courses have a significant positive effect on students’ attitudes towards IR. • Simulator training is superior to a theoretical seminar in positively influencing students’ attitudes towards IR. • Implementing dedicated IR courses in medical school might ease recruitment problems in the field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082967616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-019-06646-2
DO - 10.1007/s00330-019-06646-2
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 32221683
AN - SCOPUS:85082967616
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 30
SP - 4656
EP - 4663
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 8
ER -