Abstract
Objective To compare the ward atmosphere, safety, therapeutic hold, and patients' coherence on recently opened (1 year), opened (4 years) and open (>?20 years) psychiatric wards in a longitudinal naturalistic study design. The question was if a patient shift from formerly locked to open wards might deteriorate the ward atmosphere on the open and opened wards. Methods Ward atmosphere on two recently opened (n?=?2), opened (n?=?2) and open (n?=?2) wards was examined using the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) in a follow-up study after 4 years. Structural as well as clinical data were extracted. Results Global ward atmosphere, safety, and patients' coherence on the recently opened wards was significantly increased; on always opened wards and long-term opened wards it remained unchanged. Coercive measures and discharges against medical advice decreased during the open door process. Conclusion Opening locked psychiatric wards can help to establish a positive therapeutic atmosphere without changing the therapeutic climate on the other already open wards. A better ward atmosphere might be connected with a better therapeutic quality.
| Translated title of the contribution | Influence of an Open Door Policy on Ward Climate: Impact on Treatment Quality |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Journal | Psychiatrische Praxis |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 133-139 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| ISSN | 0303-4259 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.04.2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of an Open Door Policy on Ward Climate: Impact on Treatment Quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver