TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of item sequence on the performance of the AUDIT in general practices
AU - Bischof, G.
AU - Reinhardt, S.
AU - Grothues, J.
AU - Dybek, I.
AU - Meyer, C.
AU - Hapke, U.
AU - John, U.
AU - Rumpf, H. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is part of the German research network EARLINT (Early substance use Intervention) and is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education. The present analysis is part of the project SIP (Stepped Interventions for Problem drinkers; grant no. 01 EB 0121). Grant supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Technology (grant no. 01 EB 0121).
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/9/1
Y1 - 2005/9/1
N2 - Background: One important task in identifying subjects with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in the general medical practice setting is the development of effective screening instruments. Sensitivity of screening questionnaires might differ according to the introductory items. This study compares two versions of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) with varied item sequence randomly applied to patients derived from a sample of general practitioners (GP) patients. Methods: Participants were recruited from general practices in two northern German cities; they received two different versions of the AUDIT, one group receiving the original version starting with three items addressing frequency and quantity of alcohol use (AUDIT1), and a second group receiving a version in which these items were put at the end of the questionnaire (AUDIT2). In total, 10.803 screenings were conducted (refusal rate: 5%). Alcohol use disorders were diagnosed using the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that AUDIT1 subjects had higher scores in the consumption items of the AUDIT, whereas AUDIT2 subjects scored higher on items focussing on symptoms of alcohol dependence or abuse. Conclusion: The sequence upon which items of the AUDIT are presented influences the report of drinking patterns and symptoms of alcohol use disorders in GP patients.
AB - Background: One important task in identifying subjects with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in the general medical practice setting is the development of effective screening instruments. Sensitivity of screening questionnaires might differ according to the introductory items. This study compares two versions of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) with varied item sequence randomly applied to patients derived from a sample of general practitioners (GP) patients. Methods: Participants were recruited from general practices in two northern German cities; they received two different versions of the AUDIT, one group receiving the original version starting with three items addressing frequency and quantity of alcohol use (AUDIT1), and a second group receiving a version in which these items were put at the end of the questionnaire (AUDIT2). In total, 10.803 screenings were conducted (refusal rate: 5%). Alcohol use disorders were diagnosed using the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that AUDIT1 subjects had higher scores in the consumption items of the AUDIT, whereas AUDIT2 subjects scored higher on items focussing on symptoms of alcohol dependence or abuse. Conclusion: The sequence upon which items of the AUDIT are presented influences the report of drinking patterns and symptoms of alcohol use disorders in GP patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744471661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.03.002
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 16102379
AN - SCOPUS:23744471661
SN - 0376-8716
VL - 79
SP - 373
EP - 377
JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
IS - 3
ER -
