Effects of graded return-to-work: A propensity-score-matched analysis

Matthias Bethge*

*Corresponding author for this work
25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Graded work exposure is deemed to have a therapeutic effect. In Germany, graded return-to-work (GRTW) is therefore frequently used following a rehabilitation program if workers are still unable to perform full job duties. The aim of the analyses was to determine long-term effects on disability pension and regular employment. Methods Analyses were performed with longitudinal administrative data. Patients aged 18-60 years who attended an orthopedic, cardiac, oncological, or psychosomatic rehabilitation between January and June 2007 were eligible to participate in a GRTW scheme. The effects of GRTW were analyzed by a propensity-score-matched comparison of patients with and without GRTW. Outcomes were disability pension rates, regular income, and the duration of receiving welfare benefits due to sickness absence and unemployment up to the end of 2009. Results The propensity-score-matched sample comprised 1875 patients on GRTW and 1875 matched controls not undergoing GRTW. The probability of a disability pension was decreased by about 40% among GRTW patients [5.4% versus 8.6%; hazard rate ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.49-0.80]. The three-year income (2007-2009) was €12 920 higher (95% CI €10 054-15 786) in the GRTW group. The duration of receiving welfare benefits due to sickness absence and unemployment was significantly reduced. Conclusions Graded work exposure supports labor participation and reduces the risk of permanent work disability.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Volume42
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)273-279
Number of pages7
ISSN0355-3140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2016

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Center for Population Medicine and Public Health (ZBV)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of graded return-to-work: A propensity-score-matched analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this