EEG-controlled closed-loop dosing of propofol in rats

A. Tzabazis, Harald Ihmsen*, M. Schywalsky, H. Schwilden

*Corresponding author for this work
17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Based on previous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, we have developed an EEG-controlled closed-loop system for the i.v. hypnotic agent propofol in rats. Methods. Seven adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 423-584 g) were included in the study. EEG was recorded with occipito-occipital needle electrodes and the EEG power spectrum was estimated. The median frequency (MEF) was extracted from the power spectrum and was modified MEF (mMEF) to account for the occurrence of spikes and burst suppression patterns in the EEG. Propofol infusion was controlled by a model-based adaptive control algorithm to maintain a set point of mMEF=3.0 (SD 0.5) Hz. The performance of the feedback system was characterized by the median performance error MDPE=median{(mMEF-set point)/set point} and the median absolute performance error (MDAPE). The effective therapeutic infusion (ETI) to maintain the set point was determined from the resulting infusion rates. Results. In all rats a feedback period of 90 min could be performed. Mean MDPE was 1.2 (SE 0.4)% and MDAPE was 13.9 (0.3)%. The ETI was 0.73 (SD 0.20) mg kg-1 min-1. Mean arterial pressure before propofol infusion was 148 (14) mm Hg, with the lowest value during closed-loop infusion being 110 (20) mm Hg. Conclusions. The feedback system presented here may be a useful tool not only for automatic drug control to maintain a defined hypnotic effect but may also be a powerful device in pharmacological studies such as the determination of dose requirements or the assessment of drug-drug interactions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume92
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)564-569
Number of pages6
ISSN0007-0912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EEG-controlled closed-loop dosing of propofol in rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this