Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Photon-counting Detector High-resolution Computed Tomography of the Chest: Routine Clinical Data

Dirk Graafen, Tilman Emrich, Moritz C. Halfmann, Peter Mildenberger, Christoph Düber, Yang Yang, Ahmed E. Othman, Jim O' Doherty, Lukas Müller, Roman Kloeckner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Purpose: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) has the potential to significantly improve CT imaging in many ways including, but not limited to, low-dose high-resolution CT (HRCT) of the lung. The aim of this study was to perform an intrapatient comparison of the radiation dose and image quality of PCD-CT compared with conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Methods: A total of 32 consecutive patients with available PCD-CT and EID-CT HRCT scans were included in the final analysis. The CT dose index (CTDIvol) was extracted from patient dose reports. Qualitative image analysis comprised the lung parenchyma and mediastinal structures and was assessed by 3 readers using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative image analysis included assessment of noise and signal-to-noise ratio in the lung parenchyma, trachea, aorta, muscle, and background. Results: The mean CTDIvolwas 2.0 times higher in the conventional EID-CT scans (1.8±0.5 mGy) compared with PCD-CT (0.9±0.5 mGy, P<0.001). The overall image quality was rated significantly better by all 3 raters (P<0.001) in the PCD-CT relative to the EID-CT. Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences in noise and signal-to-noise ratio in the lung parenchyma between PCD-CT and EID-CT. Conclusion: Compared with conventional EID-CT scans, PCD-CT demonstrated similar or better objective and subjective image quality at significantly reduced dose levels in an intrapatient comparison. These results and their effect on clinical decision-making should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Thoracic Imaging
Volume37
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)315-322
Number of pages8
ISSN0883-5993
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2022

Cite this