Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study

Jens Reinhard*, A. Schreiber, U. Schiefer, E. Kasten, B. A. Sabel, S. Kenkel, R. Vonthein, S. Trauzettel-Klosinski

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Aim: To examine whether visual restitution training (VRT) is able to change absolute homonymous field defect, assessed with fundus controlled microperimetry, in patients with hemianopia. Methods: 17 patients with stable homonymous visual field defects before and after a 6 month VRT period were investigated with a specialised microperimetric method using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). Fixation was controlled by SLO fundus monitoring. The size of the field defect was quantified by calculating the ratio of the number of absolute defects and the number of test points; the training effect E was defined as the difference between these two ratios before and after training. A shift of the entire vertical visual field border by 1° would result in an E value of 0.14. Results: The mean training effect of all right eyes was E = 0.025 (SD 0.052) and all left eyes E = 0.008 (SD 0.034). In one eye, a slight non-homonymous improvement along the horizontal meridian occurred. Conclusions: In one patient, a slight improvement along the horizontal meridian was found in one eye. In none of the patients was an explicit homonymous change of the absolute field defect border observed after training.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume89
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)30-35
Number of pages6
ISSN0007-1161
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.2005

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this