Abstract
Background: Eye tracking dysfunction is a putative trait marker for susceptibility to schizophrenia; however, it cannot be recommended as an additional tool for the diagnosis of schizophrenia' due to low sensitivity and specificity. Methods: To assess the diagnostic potentials of combinations of eye movement paradigms, four smooth pursuit experiments (1; constant velocity of 15°/sec; 2 and 3: combination with either visual or auditory distractors; 4: constant velocity of 30°/sec) and two saccadic eye movement experiments (1: reflexive saccades; 2: voluntary saccades) were conducted. Fourteen patients with residual schizophrenia and 17 healthy controls were studied. Two sets of discriminant analyses (each with the resubstitution and with the 'leaving one out' method) were calculated. Results: In the first set, all 10 characteristic variables were included, whereas for the second set, the three most powerful parameters were selected (two from smooth pursuit tasks and one from a voluntary saccade experiment). This procedure provided the best classification results, regarding concordance between clinical diagnoses and eye movement dysfunction (κ = .67-.80). Conclusions: Schizophrenic patients of the residual subtype can be differentiated from healthy individuals with considerable criterion validity on the basis of paradigms from two different ocular motor systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Biological Psychiatry |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 448-458 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 0006-3223 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15.09.1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Areas and Centers
- Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Distinguishing schizophrenic patients from healthy controls by quantitative measurement of eye movement parameters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver