TY - JOUR
T1 - Distant Metastases in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
T2 - Does Location Matter? A Retrospective Analysis of 370 Patients
AU - Hahn, Felix
AU - Muller, Lukas
AU - Mahringer-Kunz, Aline
AU - Tanyildizi, Yasemin
AU - Santos, Daniel Pinto Dos
AU - Duber, Christoph
AU - Galle, Peter R.
AU - Weinmann, Arndt
AU - Kloeckner, Roman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Felix Hahn et al.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive tumor entity, and distant metastases are common. However, studies investigating patterns and clinical relevance of distant metastases are rare. Therefore, we aimed to analyze occurrence, location, and prognostic impact of distant metastases on overall survival (OS). Methods. Between 1997 and 2018, 417 patients with ICC were treated at our tertiary care center. Distant metastases and intrahepatic tumor burden were retrospectively evaluated in a longitudinal approach using volumetric assessment of cross-sectional imaging studies and all available medical/histopathological reports. Results. Finally, 370 patients with histopathologically confirmed ICC were included. Of these, 186 showed distant metastases, either initially (n = 59) or during follow-up (n = 127). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (n = 105), peritoneum (n = 81), and bone (n = 50). After detection of lung metastases, the residual median OS was 5.3 months; followed by peritoneal metastases, 4.5 months, and bone metastases, 4.4 months (P=0.17). At the time of first metastatic occurrence, residual OS according to intrahepatic tumor burden of <25%, 25-50%, and >50% was 6.5 months, 4.9 months, and 1.2 months, respectively (P<0.001). In multivariate hazard regression, hepatic tumor burden, liver function, and subsequent treatment were significant predictors of survival. Conclusions. During the disease course, every second patient developed extrahepatic metastases. While the presence of distant metastases was associated with poor patient outcomes, there was no significant difference between metastatic sites. However, hepatic tumor burden was the life-limiting risk factor in a majority of patients at the time of distant metastatic disease.
AB - Background. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive tumor entity, and distant metastases are common. However, studies investigating patterns and clinical relevance of distant metastases are rare. Therefore, we aimed to analyze occurrence, location, and prognostic impact of distant metastases on overall survival (OS). Methods. Between 1997 and 2018, 417 patients with ICC were treated at our tertiary care center. Distant metastases and intrahepatic tumor burden were retrospectively evaluated in a longitudinal approach using volumetric assessment of cross-sectional imaging studies and all available medical/histopathological reports. Results. Finally, 370 patients with histopathologically confirmed ICC were included. Of these, 186 showed distant metastases, either initially (n = 59) or during follow-up (n = 127). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (n = 105), peritoneum (n = 81), and bone (n = 50). After detection of lung metastases, the residual median OS was 5.3 months; followed by peritoneal metastases, 4.5 months, and bone metastases, 4.4 months (P=0.17). At the time of first metastatic occurrence, residual OS according to intrahepatic tumor burden of <25%, 25-50%, and >50% was 6.5 months, 4.9 months, and 1.2 months, respectively (P<0.001). In multivariate hazard regression, hepatic tumor burden, liver function, and subsequent treatment were significant predictors of survival. Conclusions. During the disease course, every second patient developed extrahepatic metastases. While the presence of distant metastases was associated with poor patient outcomes, there was no significant difference between metastatic sites. However, hepatic tumor burden was the life-limiting risk factor in a majority of patients at the time of distant metastatic disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094668376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2020/7195373
DO - 10.1155/2020/7195373
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85094668376
SN - 1687-8450
VL - 2020
JO - Journal of Oncology
JF - Journal of Oncology
M1 - 7195373
ER -