TY - JOUR
T1 - Disorders or Differences of Sex Development? Views of Affected Individuals on DSD Terminology
AU - on behalf of dsd-LIFE group
AU - Bennecke, Elena
AU - Köhler, Birgit
AU - Röhle, Robert
AU - Thyen, Ute
AU - Gehrmann, Katharina
AU - Lee, Peter
AU - Nordenström, Anna
AU - Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy
AU - Bouvattier, Clair
AU - Wiesemann, Claudia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/1/27
Y1 - 2020/1/27
N2 - Over a decade ago, the participants at the International Consensus Conference on Intersex proposed Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) as an umbrella term for “congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical”. The Group recommended the terminology be sensitive to concerns of individuals having these conditions. Yet, controversy rages over the term DSD. This multicentre clinical evaluation study was initiated as part of the European research group dsd-LIFE to evaluate patient-reported outcome. In total, 1,040 individuals with conditions labeled as Disorders of Sex Development were recruited in Poland, Sweden, Germany, France, United Kingdom and the Netherlands. All participants were asked to rate the terms describing their conditions. Overall, a large majority of participants (69%) reported that the term Disorders of Sex Development applied to their condition or that they felt neutral about it. Most participants preferred terms that were specific to their somatic condition. Overall, our data do not support the view that, in general, the term Disorders of Sex Development is insensitive to concerns of affected persons and that it should therefore be abandoned. However, in the clinical encounter, we recommend that clinicians evaluate each patient’s preferences.
AB - Over a decade ago, the participants at the International Consensus Conference on Intersex proposed Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) as an umbrella term for “congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical”. The Group recommended the terminology be sensitive to concerns of individuals having these conditions. Yet, controversy rages over the term DSD. This multicentre clinical evaluation study was initiated as part of the European research group dsd-LIFE to evaluate patient-reported outcome. In total, 1,040 individuals with conditions labeled as Disorders of Sex Development were recruited in Poland, Sweden, Germany, France, United Kingdom and the Netherlands. All participants were asked to rate the terms describing their conditions. Overall, a large majority of participants (69%) reported that the term Disorders of Sex Development applied to their condition or that they felt neutral about it. Most participants preferred terms that were specific to their somatic condition. Overall, our data do not support the view that, in general, the term Disorders of Sex Development is insensitive to concerns of affected persons and that it should therefore be abandoned. However, in the clinical encounter, we recommend that clinicians evaluate each patient’s preferences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078503132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00224499.2019.1703130
DO - 10.1080/00224499.2019.1703130
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85078503132
SN - 0022-4499
JO - Journal of Sex Research
JF - Journal of Sex Research
ER -