Abstract
Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Many patients have deep molecular responses, a prerequisite for TKI therapy discontinuation. We aimed to define precise conditions for stopping treatment. Methods: In this prospective, non-randomised trial, we enrolled patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia at 61 European centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients had chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, had received any TKI for at least 3 years (without treatment failure according to European LeukemiaNet [ELN] recommendations), and had a confirmed deep molecular response for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was molecular relapse-free survival, defined by loss of major molecular response (MMR; >0·1% BCR-ABL1 on the International Scale) and assessed in all patients with at least one molecular result. Secondary endpoints were a prognostic analysis of factors affecting maintenance of MMR at 6 months in learning and validation samples and the cost impact of stopping TKI therapy. We considered loss of haematological response, progress to accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, or blast crisis as serious adverse events. This study presents the results of the prespecified interim analysis, which was done after the 6-month molecular relapse-free survival status was known for 200 patients. The study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01596114. Findings: Between May 30, 2012, and Dec 3, 2014, we assessed 868 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia for eligibility, of whom 758 were enrolled. Median follow-up of the 755 patients evaluable for molecular response was 27 months (IQR 21–34). Molecular relapse-free survival for these patients was 61% (95% CI 57–64) at 6 months and 50% (46–54) at 24 months. Of these 755 patients, 371 (49%) lost MMR after TKI discontinuation, four (1%) died while in MMR for reasons unrelated to chronic myeloid leukaemia (myocardial infarction, lung cancer, renal cancer, and heart failure), and 13 (2%) restarted TKI therapy while in MMR. A further six (1%) patients died in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia after loss of MMR and re-initiation of TKI therapy for reasons unrelated to chronic myeloid leukaemia, and two (<1%) patients lost MMR despite restarting TKI therapy. In the prognostic analysis in 405 patients who received imatinib as first-line treatment (learning sample), longer treatment duration (odds ratio [OR] per year 1·14 [95% CI 1·05–1·23]; p=0·0010) and longer deep molecular response durations (1·13 [1·04–1·23]; p=0·0032) were associated with increasing probability of MMR maintenance at 6 months. The OR for deep molecular response duration was replicated in the validation sample consisting of 171 patients treated with any TKI as first-line treatment, although the association was not significant (1·13 [0·98–1·29]; p=0·08). TKI discontinuation was associated with substantial cost savings (an estimated €22 million). No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: Patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have achieved deep molecular responses have good molecular relapse-free survival. Such patients should be considered for TKI discontinuation, particularly those who have been in deep molecular response for a long time. Stopping treatment could spare patients from treatment-induced side-effects and reduce health expenditure. Funding: ELN Foundation and France National Cancer Institute.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The Lancet Oncology |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 747-757 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 1470-2045 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 06.2018 |
Funding
SS reports grants from ELN Foundation, during the conduct of the study, and grants and personal fees from Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), and personal fees from Pfizer and Incyte, outside the submitted work. JR reports personal fees from Novartis, and grants and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. HH-H reports grants from BMS, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, and personal fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work. AA reports personal fees from Novartis, BMS, Celgene, Alexion, and Servier, outside the submitted work. JJWMJ reports grants, personal fees, and honoraria from Novartis; grants and personal fees from BMS; personal fees from Pfizer; and honoraria from Incyte, outside the submitted work. JM reports grants from Novartis and BMS, outside the submitted work. KMP reports personal fees from Incyte and Novartis, and grants and personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work. MCM reports personal fees from Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte, and Institute for Hematology and Oncology, outside the submitted work. SM reports grants and personal fees from BMS and Novartis, grants from Pfizer, and personal fees from Celgene, outside the submitted work. PR reports personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Incyte, and grants from Pfizer and BMS, outside the submitted work. AH reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis and BMS; grants from Incyte; and grants and personal fees from Ariad and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. MP reports personal fees from Novartis and BMS, outside the submitted work. F-XM reports grants from National Cancer Institute France, during the conduct of the study. F-XM also reports grants, personal fees, and honoraria from Novartis, and personal fees from BMS, Pfizer, and Incyte, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.