TY - CHAP
T1 - Dimensions and Tensions of the Child’s Well-Being and Stem Cell Transplantation
T2 - A Conceptual Analysis
AU - Schües, Christina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The concepts of the child’s well-being and the child’s best interests are both central to medical practice concerning children. Such concepts become particularly crucial when a healthy child becomes a stem cell donor for her sick sibling. The concept of the child’s well-being inheres a tension between her well-being and her will, her present and future well-being, and the child’s individual well-being and that of the family as a whole. In this essay, I first unfold some key juridical, ethical and philosophical aspects of the concept of the child’s well-being; second, I discuss decision making in the medical realm, asking about the characteristics of the child’s will, the tension generated between the child’s will and well-being, and the stages of decision-making; and third, I refer to the perspective of temporality, which shifts the tragic problem to an open field that can keep those affected (i.e. the donor child, the recipient, and last but not least the whole family) in communication with one another. The internal relationships of the child’s well-being need to be seen in the context of the whole family’s well-being.
AB - The concepts of the child’s well-being and the child’s best interests are both central to medical practice concerning children. Such concepts become particularly crucial when a healthy child becomes a stem cell donor for her sick sibling. The concept of the child’s well-being inheres a tension between her well-being and her will, her present and future well-being, and the child’s individual well-being and that of the family as a whole. In this essay, I first unfold some key juridical, ethical and philosophical aspects of the concept of the child’s well-being; second, I discuss decision making in the medical realm, asking about the characteristics of the child’s will, the tension generated between the child’s will and well-being, and the stages of decision-making; and third, I refer to the perspective of temporality, which shifts the tragic problem to an open field that can keep those affected (i.e. the donor child, the recipient, and last but not least the whole family) in communication with one another. The internal relationships of the child’s well-being need to be seen in the context of the whole family’s well-being.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133662040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-04166-2_3
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-04166-2_3
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85133662040
T3 - Philosophy and Medicine
SP - 31
EP - 62
BT - Philosophy and Medicine
PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
ER -