TY - JOUR
T1 - DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure (DIGIT-HF)
T2 - Baseline characteristics compared to recent randomized controlled heart failure trials
AU - the DIGIT-HF Study Group
AU - Bavendiek, Udo
AU - Thomas, Nele Henrike
AU - Berliner, Dominik
AU - Liu, Xiaofei
AU - Schwab, Johannes
AU - Rieth, Andreas
AU - Maier, Lars S.
AU - Schallhorn, Sven
AU - Angelini, Eleonora
AU - Soltani, Samira
AU - Rathje, Fabian
AU - Sandu, Mircea Andrei
AU - Geller, Welf
AU - Gaspar, Thomas
AU - Hambrecht, Rainer
AU - Zdravkovic, Marija
AU - Philipp, Sebastian
AU - Kosevic, Dragana
AU - Nickenig, Georg
AU - Scheiber, Daniel
AU - Winkler, Sebastian
AU - Becher, Peter Moritz
AU - Lurz, Philipp
AU - Hülsmann, Martin
AU - von Karpowitz, Maria
AU - Schröder, Christoph
AU - Neuhaus, Barbara
AU - Seltmann, Anika
AU - von der Leyen, Heiko
AU - Veltmann, Christian
AU - Störk, Stefan
AU - Böhm, Michael
AU - Koch, Armin
AU - Großhennig, Anika
AU - Bauersachs, Johann
AU - Bavendiek, Udo
AU - Bauersachs, Johann
AU - Schindler, Christoph
AU - Koch, Armin
AU - Stichtenoth, Dirk O.
AU - Bavendiek, Udo
AU - Bauersachs, Johann
AU - Veltmann, Christian
AU - Böhm, Michael
AU - Wienbergen, Harm
AU - Thiele, Holger
AU - Graf, Tobias
AU - Reil, Jan Christian
AU - Rausch, Stefan
AU - Rogacev, Kyrill
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Aims: This report presents the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial and compares them with participants from recent trials with improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: DIGIT-HF, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial enrolling patients with symptomatic HFrEF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤30%, or NYHA class III–IV and LVEF ≤40%), compares the efficacy and safety of digitoxin versus placebo in addition to standard treatment. Most baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (1212 patients, mean age 66 ± 11 years, 20% women, mean LVEF 29 ± 7%) were similar to those in recent HFrEF trials. The distribution of NYHA class II, III, and IV was 30%, 66% and 4%, respectively, and indicates that the patients were sicker than in comparator HFrEF trials. Less patients had atrial fibrillation (27%) than those in recent HFrEF trials, but prescription rates of background therapy with beta-blockers (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (95%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (76%), and diuretics (87%) were high and similar. Overall, 40% of patients were on angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, 19% on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 9% on ivabradine. Rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD, 64%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, 25%) devices were much higher than in recent HFrEF trials. Conclusions: Patients included in DIGIT-HF display a more severe HF symptom burden and higher rates of ICD/CRT implants compared to participants in recent HFrEF trials, while pharmacotherapy was largely similar. Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT (2013–005326-38).
AB - Aims: This report presents the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial and compares them with participants from recent trials with improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: DIGIT-HF, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial enrolling patients with symptomatic HFrEF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤30%, or NYHA class III–IV and LVEF ≤40%), compares the efficacy and safety of digitoxin versus placebo in addition to standard treatment. Most baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (1212 patients, mean age 66 ± 11 years, 20% women, mean LVEF 29 ± 7%) were similar to those in recent HFrEF trials. The distribution of NYHA class II, III, and IV was 30%, 66% and 4%, respectively, and indicates that the patients were sicker than in comparator HFrEF trials. Less patients had atrial fibrillation (27%) than those in recent HFrEF trials, but prescription rates of background therapy with beta-blockers (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (95%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (76%), and diuretics (87%) were high and similar. Overall, 40% of patients were on angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, 19% on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 9% on ivabradine. Rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD, 64%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, 25%) devices were much higher than in recent HFrEF trials. Conclusions: Patients included in DIGIT-HF display a more severe HF symptom burden and higher rates of ICD/CRT implants compared to participants in recent HFrEF trials, while pharmacotherapy was largely similar. Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT (2013–005326-38).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005962433
U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.3679
DO - 10.1002/ejhf.3679
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 40389288
AN - SCOPUS:105005962433
SN - 1388-9842
VL - 27
SP - 1224
EP - 1233
JO - European Journal of Heart Failure
JF - European Journal of Heart Failure
IS - 7
ER -