"Die heilkunde wird eine wissenschaft sein, oder sie wird nicht sein" Anmerkungen zur evidenzbasierten medizin und ihrer kritik durch rogler und schölmerich (2000)

Heiner Raspe

"Die heilkunde wird eine wissenschaft sein, oder sie wird nicht sein" Anmerkungen zur evidenzbasierten medizin und ihrer kritik durch rogler und schölmerich (2000)

Translated title of the contribution: Clinical medicine will be a science or it will not be

Heiner Raspe^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During its short life time evidence-based medicine (EbM) has been subject of partly fierce criticism, mainly from the side of the clinic. In Germany, Rogler and Schölmerich (September 2000) published a critical commentary on EbM in the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. Our text is intended as a rejoinder. It firstly aims at clarifying the concept of EbM, especially its contribution to the science of clinical medicine, and it secondly answers relevant details of Rogler and Schölmerich's criticism. Their text turns out to be a mixture of truely relevant remarks, exaggerations, misunderstandings and obvious errors.

Translated title of the contribution	Clinical medicine will be a science or it will not be
Original language	German
Journal	Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung
Volume	95
Issue number	7
Pages (from-to)	495-501
Number of pages	7
ISSN	1431-7621
Publication status	Published - 2001

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this

@article{0cbe471bb56c40dda9fbe39ba5c29a70,

title = "{"}Die heilkunde wird eine wissenschaft sein, oder sie wird nicht sein{"} Anmerkungen zur evidenzbasierten medizin und ihrer kritik durch rogler und sch{\"o}lmerich (2000)",

abstract = "During its short life time evidence-based medicine (EbM) has been subject of partly fierce criticism, mainly from the side of the clinic. In Germany, Rogler and Sch{\"o}lmerich (September 2000) published a critical commentary on EbM in the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. Our text is intended as a rejoinder. It firstly aims at clarifying the concept of EbM, especially its contribution to the science of clinical medicine, and it secondly answers relevant details of Rogler and Sch{\"o}lmerich's criticism. Their text turns out to be a mixture of truely relevant remarks, exaggerations, misunderstandings and obvious errors.",

author = "Heiner Raspe",

year = "2001",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "95",

pages = "495--501",

journal = "Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung",

issn = "1431-7621",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Die heilkunde wird eine wissenschaft sein, oder sie wird nicht sein" Anmerkungen zur evidenzbasierten medizin und ihrer kritik durch rogler und schölmerich (2000)

AU - Raspe, Heiner

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - During its short life time evidence-based medicine (EbM) has been subject of partly fierce criticism, mainly from the side of the clinic. In Germany, Rogler and Schölmerich (September 2000) published a critical commentary on EbM in the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. Our text is intended as a rejoinder. It firstly aims at clarifying the concept of EbM, especially its contribution to the science of clinical medicine, and it secondly answers relevant details of Rogler and Schölmerich's criticism. Their text turns out to be a mixture of truely relevant remarks, exaggerations, misunderstandings and obvious errors.

AB - During its short life time evidence-based medicine (EbM) has been subject of partly fierce criticism, mainly from the side of the clinic. In Germany, Rogler and Schölmerich (September 2000) published a critical commentary on EbM in the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. Our text is intended as a rejoinder. It firstly aims at clarifying the concept of EbM, especially its contribution to the science of clinical medicine, and it secondly answers relevant details of Rogler and Schölmerich's criticism. Their text turns out to be a mixture of truely relevant remarks, exaggerations, misunderstandings and obvious errors.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0009805102

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

C2 - 11512222

AN - SCOPUS:0009805102

SN - 1431-7621

VL - 95

SP - 495

EP - 501

JO - Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

JF - Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

IS - 7

ER -

"Die heilkunde wird eine wissenschaft sein, oder sie wird nicht sein" Anmerkungen zur evidenzbasierten medizin und ihrer kritik durch rogler und schölmerich (2000)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this