TY - JOUR
T1 - Die Überprüfung der Konstruktvalidität des Deutschen Motorik-Tests 6-18 für 9- bis 10-Jährige. [Assessment of the construct validity of the German motor test 6-18 for 9- to 10-year-olds.]
AU - Utesch, Till
AU - Strauss, Bernd
AU - Tietjens, Maike
AU - Büsch, Dirk
AU - Ghanbari, Marie-Christine
AU - Seidel, Ilka
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - To date a one- or a two-dimensional model (coordination/condition) for the eight items of the German Motor Test 6-18 (Bös et al., 2009) has not been confirmed. Probabilistic (mixed-Rasch modeling) and classic (confirmatory factor analysis) models are used to test whether the recommended norm-categorizations or alternative categories are empirically valid. Using a cross-validation-design, two samples of 9- to 10-year-olds (N₁ = 1495, N₂ = 1357; 49.2 % female) were analyzed regarding the norm-quintiles, z-normalized norm-performance-classes, and t-transformed standard scores of the empirical data (eT-categories). This study could not show the construct validity for the two norm-categorizations published. Analyses of the eT-categories yielded a one-class-solution (mixed-Rasch modeling) if two items were excluded: “stand and reach” owing to theoretical assumptions and “balancing backward” because of local model violations. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the factorial validity. Thus homogeneity in a one-dimensional motor scale was shown for 9- to 10-year-olds. The six homogeneous items comprise a motor-/fitness-score, which can be interpreted validly in assessments of motor ability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
AB - To date a one- or a two-dimensional model (coordination/condition) for the eight items of the German Motor Test 6-18 (Bös et al., 2009) has not been confirmed. Probabilistic (mixed-Rasch modeling) and classic (confirmatory factor analysis) models are used to test whether the recommended norm-categorizations or alternative categories are empirically valid. Using a cross-validation-design, two samples of 9- to 10-year-olds (N₁ = 1495, N₂ = 1357; 49.2 % female) were analyzed regarding the norm-quintiles, z-normalized norm-performance-classes, and t-transformed standard scores of the empirical data (eT-categories). This study could not show the construct validity for the two norm-categorizations published. Analyses of the eT-categories yielded a one-class-solution (mixed-Rasch modeling) if two items were excluded: “stand and reach” owing to theoretical assumptions and “balancing backward” because of local model violations. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the factorial validity. Thus homogeneity in a one-dimensional motor scale was shown for 9- to 10-year-olds. The six homogeneous items comprise a motor-/fitness-score, which can be interpreted validly in assessments of motor ability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/291b85c7-eb9e-347c-8ec1-e321307c5bde/
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
SN - 2190-6300
VL - 22
SP - 77
EP - 90
JO - Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie
JF - Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie
IS - 2
ER -