Developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants is improved after less invasive surfactant application: Developmental outcome after LISA

Katrin Mehler*, Alexander Broer, Claudia Roll, Wolfgang Göpel, Christian Wieg, Peter Jahn, Norbert Teig, Thomas Höhn, Lars Welzing, Matthias Vochem, Marc Hoppenz, Christoph Bührer, Jeremy Franklin, Bernhard Roth, Egbert Herting, Angela Kribs

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate neurocognitive outcome at 24 months of corrected age after less invasive surfactant application (LISA) in preterm infants born at 23-26 weeks of gestational age. Methods: Surviving participants of a LISA trial conducted in 13 German level III neonatal intensive care units were reviewed for assessment of developmental outcome, hearing and vision problems, growth and rehospitalisation days. Maternal depression, breastfeeding rates and socio-economic factors were evaluated as potentially confounding factors. Results: In total, 156/182 infants took part in the study, 78 had received surfactant via LISA and 78 via endotracheal intubation. 22% of LISA infants compared to 42% of intubated infants had a psychomotor development index (PDI) <70 (0.012). A significant difference in mental development index (MDI) was observed in the stratum of more mature infants (25 and 26 weeks of GA). For this group, MDI < 70 was observed in 4% of LISA infants vs 21% of intubated infants (P = 0.008). Conclusion: At 24 months of age, the LISA-treated infants scored less often PDI < 70 and had similar results in MDI. Infants born at 25 and 26 weeks treated with LISA had lower rates of severe disability. LISA is safe and may be superior.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
ISSN0803-5253
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.09.2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants is improved after less invasive surfactant application: Developmental outcome after LISA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this